OBJECT: Astrocytomas and oligodendrogliomas are primary CNS tumors that remain a challenge to differentiate histologically because of their morphological variability and because there is a lack of reliable differential diagnostic markers. To identify proteins that are differentially expressed between astrocytomas and oligodendrogliomas, the authors analyzed the proteomic expression patterns and identified uniquely expressed proteins in these neoplasms. METHODS: Proteomes of astrocytomas and oligodendrogliomas were analyzed using 2D gel electrophoresis and subsequent computerized gel analysis to detect differentially expressed proteins. The proteins were identified using high-performance liquid chromatography accompanied by tandem mass spectrometry. To determine the role of the differentially expressed proteins in astrocytes, undifferentiated glial cell cultures were treated with dibutyryl-cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP). RESULTS: Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis revealed that glutamine synthetase was differentially expressed in astrocytomas and oligodendrogliomas. Western blot and immunohistochemical analyses confirmed the increased expression of glutamine synthetase in astrocytomas compared with oligodendrogliomas. Whereas glutamine synthetase expression was demonstrated across all grades of astrocytomas (Grade II-IV [15 tumors]) and oligoastrocytomas (4 tumors), it was expressed in only 1 oligodendroglioma (6% [16 tumors]). Treatment of undifferentiated glial cell cultures with dibutyryl-cAMP resulted in astrocyte differentiation that was associated with increased levels of glial fibrillary acidic protein and glutamine synthetase. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that glutamine synthetase expression can be used to distinguish astrocytic from oligodendroglial tumors and may play a role in the pathogenesis of astrocytomas.
OBJECT: Astrocytomas and oligodendrogliomas are primary CNS tumors that remain a challenge to differentiate histologically because of their morphological variability and because there is a lack of reliable differential diagnostic markers. To identify proteins that are differentially expressed between astrocytomas and oligodendrogliomas, the authors analyzed the proteomic expression patterns and identified uniquely expressed proteins in these neoplasms. METHODS: Proteomes of astrocytomas and oligodendrogliomas were analyzed using 2D gel electrophoresis and subsequent computerized gel analysis to detect differentially expressed proteins. The proteins were identified using high-performance liquid chromatography accompanied by tandem mass spectrometry. To determine the role of the differentially expressed proteins in astrocytes, undifferentiated glial cell cultures were treated with dibutyryl-cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP). RESULTS: Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis revealed that glutamine synthetase was differentially expressed in astrocytomas and oligodendrogliomas. Western blot and immunohistochemical analyses confirmed the increased expression of glutamine synthetase in astrocytomas compared with oligodendrogliomas. Whereas glutamine synthetase expression was demonstrated across all grades of astrocytomas (Grade II-IV [15 tumors]) and oligoastrocytomas (4 tumors), it was expressed in only 1 oligodendroglioma (6% [16 tumors]). Treatment of undifferentiated glial cell cultures with dibutyryl-cAMP resulted in astrocyte differentiation that was associated with increased levels of glial fibrillary acidic protein and glutamine synthetase. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that glutamine synthetase expression can be used to distinguish astrocytic from oligodendroglial tumors and may play a role in the pathogenesis of astrocytomas.
Authors: Hiroaki Okamoto; Jie Li; Alexander O Vortmeyer; Howard Jaffe; Youn-Soo Lee; Sven Gläsker; Tae-Sung Sohn; Weifen Zeng; Barbara Ikejiri; Martin A Proescholdt; Christina Mayer; Robert J Weil; Edward H Oldfield; Zhengping Zhuang Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2006-10-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Timothy W Vogel; Zhengping Zhuang; Jie Li; Hiroaki Okamoto; Makoto Furuta; Youn-Soo Lee; Weifen Zeng; Edward H Oldfield; Alexander O Vortmeyer; Robert J Weil Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2005-05-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Hui Li Li; Zhi Li; Lu Ye Qin; Shuang Liu; Lok Ting Lau; Ji Sheng Han; Albert Cheung Hoi Yu Journal: FEBS Lett Date: 2006-02-20 Impact factor: 4.124
Authors: J G Cairncross; K Ueki; M C Zlatescu; D K Lisle; D M Finkelstein; R R Hammond; J S Silver; P C Stark; D R Macdonald; Y Ino; D A Ramsay; D N Louis Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 1998-10-07 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: David N Louis; Hiroko Ohgaki; Otmar D Wiestler; Webster K Cavenee; Peter C Burger; Anne Jouvet; Bernd W Scheithauer; Paul Kleihues Journal: Acta Neuropathol Date: 2007-07-06 Impact factor: 17.088
Authors: Susan A Elmore; Vivian S Chen; Schantel Hayes-Bouknight; Jessica S Hoane; Kyathanahalli Janardhan; Linda H Kooistra; Thomas Nolte; Kathleen A Szabo; Gabrielle A Willson; Jeffrey C Wolf; David E Malarkey Journal: Toxicol Pathol Date: 2016-11-11 Impact factor: 1.902
Authors: Chunzhang Yang; Joey C Matro; Kristin M Huntoon; Donald Y Ye; Thanh T Huynh; Stephanie M J Fliedner; Jan Breza; Zhengping Zhuang; Karel Pacak Journal: FASEB J Date: 2012-07-26 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Go Woon Kim; Dong Hoon Lee; Yu Hyun Jeon; Jung Yoo; So Yeon Kim; Sang Wu Lee; Ha Young Cho; So Hee Kwon Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2021-02-08 Impact factor: 5.923
Authors: Martina Chiu; Giuseppe Taurino; Massimiliano G Bianchi; Laura Ottaviani; Roberta Andreoli; Tecla Ciociola; Costanza A M Lagrasta; Saverio Tardito; Ovidio Bussolati Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2018-04-06 Impact factor: 5.923