Literature DB >> 21682424

Dynamics of communal vocalizations in a social songbird, the zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata).

Julie E Elie1, Hédi A Soula, Nicolas Mathevon, Clémentine Vignal.   

Abstract

Colonies or communities of animals such as fishes, frogs, seabirds, or marine mammals can be noisy. Although vocal communication between clearly identified sender(s) and receiver(s) has been well studied, the properties of the noisy sound that results from the acoustic network of a colony of gregarious animals have received less attention. The resulting sound could nonetheless convey some information about the emitting group. Using custom-written software for automatic detection of vocalizations occurring over many hours of recordings, this study reports acoustic features of communal vocal activities in a gregarious species, the zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata). By biasing the sex ratio and using two different housing conditions (individual versus communal housing), six groups of zebra finches were generated, with six different social structures that varied both in terms of sex-composition and proportion of paired individuals. The results showed that the rate of emission and the acoustic dynamic both depended on the social structure. In particular, the vocal activity of a group of zebra finches depended mainly on the number of unpaired birds, i.e., individuals not part of a stably bonded pair.
© 2011 Acoustical Society of America

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21682424     DOI: 10.1121/1.3570959

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  9 in total

1.  Reconstruction of vocal interactions in a group of small songbirds.

Authors:  Victor N Anisimov; Joshua A Herbst; Andrei N Abramchuk; Alexander V Latanov; Richard H R Hahnloser; Alexei L Vyssotski
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2014-09-28       Impact factor: 28.547

2.  The Forebrain Song System Mediates Predictive Call Timing in Female and Male Zebra Finches.

Authors:  Jonathan I Benichov; Sam E Benezra; Daniela Vallentin; Eitan Globerson; Michael A Long; Ofer Tchernichovski
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  The vocal repertoire of the domesticated zebra finch: a data-driven approach to decipher the information-bearing acoustic features of communication signals.

Authors:  Julie E Elie; Frédéric E Theunissen
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 3.084

4.  Adult male mice emit context-specific ultrasonic vocalizations that are modulated by prior isolation or group rearing environment.

Authors:  Jonathan Chabout; Pierre Serreau; Elodie Ey; Ludovic Bellier; Thierry Aubin; Thomas Bourgeron; Sylvie Granon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Power-law scaling of calling dynamics in zebra finches.

Authors:  Shouwen Ma; Andries Ter Maat; Manfred Gahr
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Mismatch Responses Evoked by Sound Pattern Violation in the Songbird Forebrain Suggest Common Auditory Processing With Human.

Authors:  Chihiro Mori; Kazuo Okanoya
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 4.566

7.  Patterns of call communication between group-housed zebra finches change during the breeding cycle.

Authors:  Lisa F Gill; Wolfgang Goymann; Andries Ter Maat; Manfred Gahr
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 8.  Finding the Beat: From Socially Coordinated Vocalizations in Songbirds to Rhythmic Entrainment in Humans.

Authors:  Jonathan I Benichov; Eitan Globerson; Ofer Tchernichovski
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  A New Semi-automated Method for Assessing Avian Acoustic Networks Reveals that Juvenile and Adult Zebra Finches Have Separate Calling Networks.

Authors:  Marie S A Fernandez; Hedi A Soula; Mylene M Mariette; Clémentine Vignal
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-11-29
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.