PURPOSE: This study was designed to assess the fate and the overall potential impacts of the widely prescribed drugs ranitidine and tramadol after their introduction into the aquatic environment. METHODS: The probability to detect these two drugs in the aquatic environment was studied by analyzing their abiotic and biotic degradation properties. For this purpose, samples were irradiated with different light sources, and three widely used biodegradability tests from the OECD series, the closed bottle test (OECD 301 D), the manometric respirometry test (OECD 301 F) and the Zahn-Wellens test (OECD 302 B), were conducted. The ecotoxicity of the photolytically formed transformation products was assessed by performing the bacterial growth inhibition test (EN ISO 10712). Furthermore, quantitative structure-activity relationship analysis and a risk analysis based on the calculation of the predicted environmental concentrations have also been conducted to assess the environmental risk potential of the transformation products. The possible formation of stable products by microbial or photolytical transformation has been investigated with DOC and LC-MS analytics. RESULTS: In the present study, neither ranitidine, nor tramadol, nor their photoderivatives were found to be readily or inherently biodegradable according to test guidelines. The photolytic transformation was faster under a UV lamp compared to the reaction under an Xe lamp with a spectrum that mimics sunlight. No chronic toxicity against bacteria was found for ranitidine or its photolytic decomposition products, but a low toxicity was detected for the resulting mixture of the photolytic transformation products of tramadol. CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrates that transformation products may have a higher environmental risk potential than the respective parent compounds.
PURPOSE: This study was designed to assess the fate and the overall potential impacts of the widely prescribed drugs ranitidine and tramadol after their introduction into the aquatic environment. METHODS: The probability to detect these two drugs in the aquatic environment was studied by analyzing their abiotic and biotic degradation properties. For this purpose, samples were irradiated with different light sources, and three widely used biodegradability tests from the OECD series, the closed bottle test (OECD 301 D), the manometric respirometry test (OECD 301 F) and the Zahn-Wellens test (OECD 302 B), were conducted. The ecotoxicity of the photolytically formed transformation products was assessed by performing the bacterial growth inhibition test (EN ISO 10712). Furthermore, quantitative structure-activity relationship analysis and a risk analysis based on the calculation of the predicted environmental concentrations have also been conducted to assess the environmental risk potential of the transformation products. The possible formation of stable products by microbial or photolytical transformation has been investigated with DOC and LC-MS analytics. RESULTS: In the present study, neither ranitidine, nor tramadol, nor their photoderivatives were found to be readily or inherently biodegradable according to test guidelines. The photolytic transformation was faster under a UV lamp compared to the reaction under an Xe lamp with a spectrum that mimics sunlight. No chronic toxicity against bacteria was found for ranitidine or its photolytic decomposition products, but a low toxicity was detected for the resulting mixture of the photolytic transformation products of tramadol. CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrates that transformation products may have a higher environmental risk potential than the respective parent compounds.
Authors: Ettore Zuccato; Sara Castiglioni; Roberto Fanelli; Giuseppe Reitano; Renzo Bagnati; Chiara Chiabrando; Francesco Pomati; Carlo Rossetti; Davide Calamari Journal: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int Date: 2006-01 Impact factor: 4.223
Authors: Alessandra Carucci; Giovanna Cappai; Martina Piredda Journal: J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng Date: 2006 Impact factor: 2.269
Authors: Douglas E Latch; Brian L Stender; Jennifer L Packer; William A Arnold; Kristopher McNeill Journal: Environ Sci Technol Date: 2003-08-01 Impact factor: 9.028
Authors: Kathryn M Onesios-Barry; David Berry; Jody B Proescher; I K Ashok Sivakumar; Edward J Bouwer Journal: Appl Environ Microbiol Date: 2014-02-07 Impact factor: 4.792
Authors: Marlies Bergheim; Richard Gminski; Bernd Spangenberg; Malgorzata Debiak; Alexander Bürkle; Volker Mersch-Sundermann; Klaus Kümmerer; Reto Gieré Journal: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int Date: 2015-07-15 Impact factor: 4.223
Authors: Maximilian E Müller; Beate I Escher; Marc Schwientek; Martina Werneburg; Christiane Zarfl; Christian Zwiener Journal: Environ Sci Eur Date: 2018-06-18 Impact factor: 5.893
Authors: Roosevelt D S Bezerra; Márcia M F Silva; Alan I S Morais; Josy A Osajima; Maria R M C Santos; Claudio Airoldi; Edson C Silva Filho Journal: Materials (Basel) Date: 2014-12-09 Impact factor: 3.623