Literature DB >> 21680957

Benefits and drawbacks of zinc in glass ionomer bone cements.

Delia S Brauer1, Eileen Gentleman, David F Farrar, Molly M Stevens, Robert G Hill.   

Abstract

Glass polyalkenoate (ionomer) cements (GPCs) based on poly(acrylic acid) and fluoro-alumino-silicate glasses are successfully used in a variety of orthopaedic and dental applications; however, they release small amounts of aluminium, which is a neurotoxin and inhibits bone mineralization in vivo. Therefore there has been significant interest in developing aluminium-free glasses containing zinc for forming GPCs because zinc can play a similar structural role in the glass, allowing for glass degradation and subsequent cement setting, and is reported to have beneficial effects on bone formation. We created zinc-containing GPCs and characterized their mechanical properties and biocompatibility. Zinc-containing cements showed adhesion to bone close to 1 MPa, which was significantly greater than that of zinc-free cements (<0.05 MPa) and other currently approved biological adhesives. However, zinc-containing cements produced significantly lower metabolic activity in mouse osteoblasts exposed to cell culture medium conditioned with the cements than controls. Results show that although low levels of zinc may be beneficial to cells, zinc concentrations of 400 µM Zn(2+) or more resulted in cell death. In summary, we demonstrate that while zinc-containing GPCs possess excellent mechanical properties, they fail basic biocompatibility tests, produce an acute cytotoxic response in vitro, which may preclude their use in vivo.
© 2011 IOP Publishing Ltd

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21680957     DOI: 10.1088/1748-6041/6/4/045007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomed Mater        ISSN: 1748-6041            Impact factor:   3.715


  11 in total

1.  Polymers for 3D Printing and Customized Additive Manufacturing.

Authors:  Samuel Clark Ligon; Robert Liska; Jürgen Stampfl; Matthias Gurr; Rolf Mülhaupt
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2017-07-30       Impact factor: 60.622

2.  Bactericidal strontium-releasing injectable bone cements based on bioactive glasses.

Authors:  Delia S Brauer; Natalia Karpukhina; Gopal Kedia; Aditya Bhat; Robert V Law; Izabela Radecka; Robert G Hill
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Surface properties and ion release from fluoride-containing bioactive glasses promote osteoblast differentiation and mineralization in vitro.

Authors:  E Gentleman; M M Stevens; R G Hill; D S Brauer
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2012-11-02       Impact factor: 8.947

4.  Synthetic osteogenic extracellular matrix formed by coated silicon dioxide nanosprings.

Authors:  Jamie L Hass; Erin M Garrison; Sarah A Wicher; Ben Knapp; Nathan Bridges; Dn McLlroy; Gustavo Arrizabalaga
Journal:  J Nanobiotechnology       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 10.435

5.  Biological and mechanical properties of an experimental glass-ionomer cement modified by partial replacement of CaO with MgO or ZnO.

Authors:  Dong-Ae Kim; Hany Abo-Mosallam; Hye-Young Lee; Jung-Hwan Lee; Hae-Won Kim; Hae-Hyoung Lee
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.698

6.  Evaluation of zinc-doped mesoporous hydroxyapatite microspheres for the construction of a novel biomimetic scaffold optimized for bone augmentation.

Authors:  Weilin Yu; Tuan-Wei Sun; Chao Qi; Zhenyu Ding; Huakun Zhao; Shichang Zhao; Zhongmin Shi; Ying-Jie Zhu; Daoyun Chen; Yaohua He
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2017-03-24

Review 7.  Bioactive Glasses: Where Are We and Where Are We Going?

Authors:  Francesco Baino; Sepideh Hamzehlou; Saeid Kargozar
Journal:  J Funct Biomater       Date:  2018-03-19

8.  A comparison of lithium-substituted phosphate and borate bioactive glasses for mineralised tissue repair.

Authors:  Ke Zhang; Abeer Alaohali; Nuttawan Sawangboon; Paul T Sharpe; Delia S Brauer; Eileen Gentleman
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 5.304

9.  In vivo analysis of a proprietary glass-based adhesive for sternal fixation and stabilization using rabbit and sheep models.

Authors:  Cina Mehrvar; Emily Deignan; Mark Hurtig; Gideon Cohen; Paul Zalzal; Oleg Safir; Adel Alhalawani; Marcello Papini; Mark R Towler
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 3.896

10.  Optimisation of lithium-substituted bioactive glasses to tailor cell response for hard tissue repair.

Authors:  Jeison Gabriel da Silva; Rebecca Babb; Christoph Salzlechner; Paul T Sharpe; Delia S Brauer; Eileen Gentleman
Journal:  J Mater Sci       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 4.220

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.