Literature DB >> 21680947

Has my patient responded? Interpreting clinical measurements such as the 6-minute-walk test.

Thomas E Dolmage1, Kylie Hill, Rachael A Evans, Roger S Goldstein.   

Abstract

To correctly interpret clinical measurements it is necessary to understand the standard deviation and the standard error; the former reflects the range or variability of individuals within a sample and the latter reflects the precision for which the group parameters have been estimated. When evaluating an individual patient, test measurement properties such as repeatability will assist in concluding whether a repeated test, measured to monitor the response to an intervention, has changed beyond its natural variability. Using the “best” test has an inherent bias and ignores the natural test variation, whereas the average of repeated tests is more representative of the true value, making it more discriminative to change. Serial measurements to follow progress will increase a clinician's confidence in the observed effects of treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21680947     DOI: 10.1164/rccm.201103-0497CC

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med        ISSN: 1073-449X            Impact factor:   21.405


  15 in total

1.  Creating a community-physical therapy partnership to increase physical activity in urban African-American adults.

Authors:  William E Healey; Monique Reed; Gail Huber
Journal:  Prog Community Health Partnersh       Date:  2013

Review 2.  Six-Minute Walk Test for Assessing Physical Functional Capacity in Chronic Heart Failure.

Authors:  Huiyun Du; Parichat Wonggom; Jintana Tongpeth; Robyn A Clark
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2017-06

3.  Inspiratory muscle training in patients with heart failure: a systematic review.

Authors:  Suh-Jen Lin; Jessica McElfresh; Benjamin Hall; Rachel Bloom; Kellie Farrell
Journal:  Cardiopulm Phys Ther J       Date:  2012-09

4.  Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease self-management activation research trial (COPD-SMART): design and methods.

Authors:  Jamile Ashmore; Rennie Russo; Jennifer Peoples; John Sloan; Bradford E Jackson; Sejong Bae; Karan P Singh; Steven N Blair; David Coultas
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 2.226

5.  Optimizing the 6-min walk test as a measure of exercise capacity in COPD.

Authors:  Divay Chandra; Robert A Wise; Hrishikesh S Kulkarni; Roberto P Benzo; Gerard Criner; Barry Make; William A Slivka; Andrew L Ries; John J Reilly; Fernando J Martinez; Frank C Sciurba
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 9.410

6.  Responsiveness of Various Exercise-Testing Protocols to Therapeutic Interventions in COPD.

Authors:  Benoit Borel; Steeve Provencher; Didier Saey; François Maltais
Journal:  Pulm Med       Date:  2013-01-28

7.  A simple clinical measure of quadriceps muscle strength identifies responders to pulmonary rehabilitation.

Authors:  James R Walsh; Norman R Morris; Zoe J McKeough; Stephanie T Yerkovich; Jenny D Paratz
Journal:  Pulm Med       Date:  2014-01-30

Review 8.  IPF clinical trial design and endpoints.

Authors:  Steven D Nathan; Keith C Meyer
Journal:  Curr Opin Pulm Med       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 3.155

Review 9.  Treatment of pulmonary hypertension in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: shortfall in efficacy or trial design?

Authors:  Steven D Nathan; Christopher S King
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 4.162

10.  Exercise rehabilitation for patients with critical illness: a randomized controlled trial with 12 months of follow-up.

Authors:  Linda Denehy; Elizabeth H Skinner; Lara Edbrooke; Kimberley Haines; Stephen Warrillow; Graeme Hawthorne; Karla Gough; Steven Vander Hoorn; Meg E Morris; Sue Berney
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.