BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The simplified modified Rankin Scale questionnaire (smRSq) enables a reliable and rapid determination of the modified Rankin Scale score after stroke. We test the reliability and validity of a slightly revised smRSq. METHODS: Fifty consecutive outpatients 4.83 ± 3.00 months after stroke were scored with a slightly revised smRSq by 3 raters selected consecutively from a list of 10: 4 stroke faculty, 3 neurology residents, 2 medial students, and 1 stroke research coordinator. Two ratings were in person within 20 minutes of each other and 1 was by telephone 1 to 3 days later. The telephone rating also included a quality of life scale, the Short-Form-12v2. Each rater was blinded to the other raters' scores. RESULTS: The average estimated time to administer the smRSq was 1.29 minutes (range, 0.50 to 2.25 minutes). The in-person raters agreed 78% (κ=0.71; CI, 0.57 to 0.86 and weighted κ [κ(w)]=0.86; CI, 0.79 to 0.94). The first in-person and telephone raters agreed 82% (κ=0.76; CI, 0.63 to 0.90 and κ(w)=0.87; CI, 0.79 to 0.95). The second in-person and telephone rates agreed 82% (κ=0.77; CI, 0.63 to 0.90 and κ(w)=0.89; CI, 0.82 to 0.96). The smRSq correlated with the physical (r=-0.50, P=0.005) than the mental (r=-0.36, P=0.048) components of the Short-Form-12v2. CONCLUSIONS: The slightly revised smRSq appears to be useful in clinical stroke; it has excellent reliability in person and by telephone, can usually be administered in <1.5 minutes by a wide variety of raters, and correlates with quality of life.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The simplified modified Rankin Scale questionnaire (smRSq) enables a reliable and rapid determination of the modified Rankin Scale score after stroke. We test the reliability and validity of a slightly revised smRSq. METHODS: Fifty consecutive outpatients 4.83 ± 3.00 months after stroke were scored with a slightly revised smRSq by 3 raters selected consecutively from a list of 10: 4 stroke faculty, 3 neurology residents, 2 medial students, and 1 stroke research coordinator. Two ratings were in person within 20 minutes of each other and 1 was by telephone 1 to 3 days later. The telephone rating also included a quality of life scale, the Short-Form-12v2. Each rater was blinded to the other raters' scores. RESULTS: The average estimated time to administer the smRSq was 1.29 minutes (range, 0.50 to 2.25 minutes). The in-person raters agreed 78% (κ=0.71; CI, 0.57 to 0.86 and weighted κ [κ(w)]=0.86; CI, 0.79 to 0.94). The first in-person and telephone raters agreed 82% (κ=0.76; CI, 0.63 to 0.90 and κ(w)=0.87; CI, 0.79 to 0.95). The second in-person and telephone rates agreed 82% (κ=0.77; CI, 0.63 to 0.90 and κ(w)=0.89; CI, 0.82 to 0.96). The smRSq correlated with the physical (r=-0.50, P=0.005) than the mental (r=-0.36, P=0.048) components of the Short-Form-12v2. CONCLUSIONS: The slightly revised smRSq appears to be useful in clinical stroke; it has excellent reliability in person and by telephone, can usually be administered in <1.5 minutes by a wide variety of raters, and correlates with quality of life.
Authors: Carmen E Capo-Lugo; Robert L Askew; Kathryn Muldoon; Matthew Maas; Eric Liotta; Shyam Prabhakaran; Andrew Naidech Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2019-12-23 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Andrew M Naidech; Jennifer L Beaumont; Michael Berman; Brandon Francis; Eric Liotta; Matthew B Maas; Shyam Prabhakaran; Jane Holl; David Cella Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2015-08 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: P Jaquet; E de Montmollin; C Dupuis; C Sazio; M Conrad; V Susset; S Demeret; J M Tadie; L Argaud; F Barbier; B Sarton; R Chabane; D Daubin; N Brulé; N Lerolle; M Alves; D Da Silva; A El Kalioubi; S Silva; P Bailly; M Wolff; L Bouadma; J F Timsit; R Sonneville Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2019-07-10 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Yuko Y Palesch; Sharon D Yeatts; Thomas A Tomsick; Lydia D Foster; Andrew M Demchuk; Pooja Khatri; Michael D Hill; Edward C Jauch; Tudor G Jovin; Bernard Yan; Rüdiger von Kummer; Carlos A Molina; Mayank Goyal; Wouter J Schonewille; Mikael Mazighi; Stefan T Engelter; Craig Anderson; Judith Spilker; Janice Carrozzella; Karla J Ryckborst; L Scott Janis; Annie Simpson; Kit N Simpson; Joseph P Broderick Journal: Stroke Date: 2015-04-09 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Krishma Adatia; Romergryko G Geocadin; Ryan Healy; Wendy Ziai; Luciano Ponce-Mejia; Mirinda Anderson-White; Dhaval Shah; Batya R Radzik; Caitlin Palmisano; Charles W Hogue; Charles Brown; Lucia Rivera-Lara Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2018-08 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Meredith P Murphy; Joji B Kuramatsu; Audrey Leasure; Guido J Falcone; Hooman Kamel; Lauren H Sansing; Christina Kourkoulis; Kristin Schwab; Jordan J Elm; M Edip Gurol; Huy Tran; Steven M Greenberg; Anand Viswanathan; Christopher D Anderson; Stefan Schwab; Jonathan Rosand; Fu-Dong Shi; Steven J Kittner; Fernando D Testai; Daniel Woo; Carl D Langefeld; Michael L James; Sebastian Koch; Hagen B Huttner; Alessandro Biffi; Kevin N Sheth Journal: Stroke Date: 2018-11 Impact factor: 7.914