Literature DB >> 21680423

Trilobite tagmosis and body patterning from morphological and developmental perspectives.

Nigel C Hughes1.   

Abstract

The Trilobita were characterized by a cephalic region in which the biomineralized exoskeleton showed relatively high morphological differentiation among a taxonomically stable set of well defined segments, and an ontogenetically and taxonomically dynamic trunk region in which both exoskeletal segments and ventral appendages were similar in overall form. Ventral appendages were homonomous biramous limbs throughout both the cephalon and trunk, except for the most anterior appendage pair that was antenniform, preoral, and uniramous, and a posteriormost pair of antenniform cerci, known only in one species. In some clades trunk exoskeletal segments were divided into two batches. In some, but not all, of these clades the boundary between batches coincided with the boundary between the thorax and the adult pygidium. The repeated differentiation of the trunk into two batches of segments from the homonomous trunk condition indicates an evolutionary trend in aspects of body patterning regulation that was achieved independently in several trilobite clades. The phylogenetic placement of trilobites and congruence of broad patterns of tagmosis with those seen among extant arthropods suggest that the expression domains of trilobite cephalic Hox genes may have overlapped in a manner similar to that seen among extant arachnates. This, coupled with the fact that trilobites likely possessed ten Hox genes, presents one alternative to a recent model in which Hox gene distribution in trilobites was equated to eight putative divisions of the trilobite body plan.

Year:  2003        PMID: 21680423     DOI: 10.1093/icb/43.1.185

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Integr Comp Biol        ISSN: 1540-7063            Impact factor:   3.326


  7 in total

1.  Burgess Shale fossils shed light on the agnostid problem.

Authors:  J Moysiuk; J-B Caron
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Development and trunk segmentation of early instars of a ptychopariid trilobite from Cambrian Stage 5 of China.

Authors:  Cen Shen; Euan N K Clarkson; Jie Yang; Tian Lan; Jin-bo Hou; Xi-guang Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-11-10       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Anamorphic development and extended parental care in a 520 million-year-old stem-group euarthropod from China.

Authors:  Dongjing Fu; Javier Ortega-Hernández; Allison C Daley; Xingliang Zhang; Degan Shu
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2018-09-29       Impact factor: 3.260

4.  Intraspecific variation in the Cambrian: new observations on the morphology of the Chengjiang euarthropod Sinoburius lunaris.

Authors:  Michel Schmidt; Yu Liu; Xianguang Hou; Joachim T Haug; Carolin Haug; Huijan Mai; Roland R Melzer
Journal:  BMC Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-06-21

5.  Arthroaspis n. gen., a common element of the Sirius Passet Lagerstätte (Cambrian, North Greenland), sheds light on trilobite ancestry.

Authors:  Martin Stein; Graham E Budd; John S Peel; David A T Harper
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2013-05-11       Impact factor: 3.260

6.  Ancestral patterning of tergite formation in a centipede suggests derived mode of trunk segmentation in trilobites.

Authors:  Javier Ortega-Hernández; Carlo Brena
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Revision of the mollisoniid chelicerate(?) Thelxiope, with a new species from the middle Cambrian Wheeler Formation of Utah.

Authors:  Rudy Lerosey-Aubril; Jacob Skabelund; Javier Ortega-Hernández
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 2.984

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.