PURPOSE: To estimate patient satisfaction with telephone follow-up and compare the frequencies of postoperative complications between patients undergoing telephone and those undergoing clinical follow-up after ambulatory office-based dentoalveolar procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using a retrospective study design, the investigators enrolled a cohort of subjects who had had at least 1 tooth extracted during a 2-year period. The primary study variable was subject self-report of satisfaction with the telephone follow-up. For additional analyses, the predictor variable was follow-up type grouped as telephone versus clinical. The outcome variable was postoperative complications. To measure the relationships between the follow-up type and postoperative complications, bivariate and multiple logistic regression statistics were computed. P ≤ .05 was considered significant. RESULTS: The sample was composed of 364 subjects, of whom 155 (42.6%) had received telephone follow-up. The sample's mean age was 28.6 ± 11.7 years, included 220 females (60.4%), and had had an average of 3.4 ± 2.1 teeth removed. The self-reported patient satisfaction rate with telephone follow-up was 95.9%. The subjects who experienced postoperative complications were 90% less likely to be satisfied relative to those without complications (P = .04). The overall complication frequency was 19.2%, with telephone follow-up subjects having a lower complication frequency (12.9%) than the clinical follow-up subjects (23.4%) (P < .01). After adjusting for differences between the 2 samples, no significant difference was found in the complication frequencies according to the method of follow-up (P = .7). CONCLUSION: Patient satisfaction with telephone follow-up was high. The subjects scheduled for telephone follow-up had a complication rate that was similar to that of the clinical follow-up subjects.
PURPOSE: To estimate patient satisfaction with telephone follow-up and compare the frequencies of postoperative complications between patients undergoing telephone and those undergoing clinical follow-up after ambulatory office-based dentoalveolar procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using a retrospective study design, the investigators enrolled a cohort of subjects who had had at least 1 tooth extracted during a 2-year period. The primary study variable was subject self-report of satisfaction with the telephone follow-up. For additional analyses, the predictor variable was follow-up type grouped as telephone versus clinical. The outcome variable was postoperative complications. To measure the relationships between the follow-up type and postoperative complications, bivariate and multiple logistic regression statistics were computed. P ≤ .05 was considered significant. RESULTS: The sample was composed of 364 subjects, of whom 155 (42.6%) had received telephone follow-up. The sample's mean age was 28.6 ± 11.7 years, included 220 females (60.4%), and had had an average of 3.4 ± 2.1 teeth removed. The self-reported patient satisfaction rate with telephone follow-up was 95.9%. The subjects who experienced postoperative complications were 90% less likely to be satisfied relative to those without complications (P = .04). The overall complication frequency was 19.2%, with telephone follow-up subjects having a lower complication frequency (12.9%) than the clinical follow-up subjects (23.4%) (P < .01). After adjusting for differences between the 2 samples, no significant difference was found in the complication frequencies according to the method of follow-up (P = .7). CONCLUSION:Patient satisfaction with telephone follow-up was high. The subjects scheduled for telephone follow-up had a complication rate that was similar to that of the clinical follow-up subjects.
Authors: Jo Thompson-Coon; Abdul-Kareem Abdul-Rahman; Rebecca Whear; Alison Bethel; Bijay Vaidya; Christian A Gericke; Ken Stein Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2013-04-05 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Pedro Christian Aravena; Felipe Delgado; Hugo Olave; Carolina Ulloa-Marin; Francisco Perez-Rojas Journal: Patient Prefer Adherence Date: 2016-09-06 Impact factor: 2.711
Authors: Diana Heimes; Philipp Luhrenberg; Nils Langguth; Sebahat Kaya; Christine Obst; Peer W Kämmerer Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-03-15 Impact factor: 3.390