Literature DB >> 21680003

A phase I trial of intravesical nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel in the treatment of bacillus Calmette-Guérin refractory nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer.

James M McKiernan1, LaMont J Barlow, Melissa A Laudano, Mark J Mann, Daniel P Petrylak, Mitchell C Benson.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Up to 50% of patients treated with intravesical agents for high grade nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer will have disease recurrence. Response rates to current second line intravesical therapies are low and for these high risk patients novel agents are necessary. Our previously completed phase I trial showed docetaxel was a safe agent for intravesical use. Nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (Abraxane®, ABI-007) has been shown to have increased solubility and lower toxicity compared to docetaxel in systemic therapy. Thus, we assessed the dose limiting toxicity and maximum deliverable dose of intravesical nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Inclusion criteria for this institutional review board approved phase I trial were recurrent high grade Ta, T1 and Tis transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder for which at least 1 prior standard intravesical regimen failed. Six weekly instillations of nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel were administered with a modified Fibonacci dose escalation model used until the maximum deliverable dose was achieved. The primary end point was dose limiting toxicity and the secondary end point was response rate.
RESULTS: A total of 18 patients were enrolled in the study. One patient demonstrated measurable systemic absorption after 1 infusion. Grade 1 local toxicities were experienced by 10 (56%) patients with dysuria being the most common, and no grade 2, 3 or 4 drug related local toxicities were encountered. Of the 18 patients 5 (28%) had no evidence of disease at posttreatment evaluation.
CONCLUSIONS: Intravesical nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel exhibited minimal toxicity and systemic absorption in the first human intravesical phase I trial to our knowledge. A larger phase II study has begun to formally evaluate the activity of this regimen.
Copyright © 2011 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21680003     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.03.129

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  20 in total

Review 1.  Advances in intravesical therapy for urinary tract disorders.

Authors:  Pradeep Tyagi; Mahendra Kashyap; Harvey Hensley; Naoki Yoshimura
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Deliv       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 6.648

Review 2.  Management of carcinoma in situ of the bladder: best practice and recent developments.

Authors:  Dominic H Tang; Sam S Chang
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2015-12

Review 3.  Clinical Translation of Nanomedicine.

Authors:  Yuanzeng Min; Joseph M Caster; Michael J Eblan; Andrew Z Wang
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 60.622

Review 4.  Alternative therapies in patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Öner Şanlı; Yair Lotan
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2017-12-01

5.  Increased endocytosis of magnetic nanoparticles into cancerous urothelial cells versus normal urothelial cells.

Authors:  Jasna Lojk; Vladimir Boštjan Bregar; Klemen Strojan; Samo Hudoklin; Peter Veranič; Mojca Pavlin; Mateja Erdani Kreft
Journal:  Histochem Cell Biol       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 4.304

Review 6.  Nanotechnology in bladder cancer: current state of development and clinical practice.

Authors:  Ben Tomlinson; Tzu-yin Lin; Marc Dall'Era; Chong-Xian Pan
Journal:  Nanomedicine (Lond)       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 5.307

7.  Intravesical rAd-IFNα/Syn3 for Patients With High-Grade, Bacillus Calmette-Guerin-Refractory or Relapsed Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Phase II Randomized Study.

Authors:  Neal D Shore; Stephen A Boorjian; Daniel J Canter; Kenneth Ogan; Lawrence I Karsh; Tracy M Downs; Leonard G Gomella; Ashish M Kamat; Yair Lotan; Robert S Svatek; Trinity J Bivalacqua; Robert L Grubb; Tracey L Krupski; Seth P Lerner; Michael E Woods; Brant A Inman; Matthew I Milowsky; Alan Boyd; F Peter Treasure; Gillian Gregory; David G Sawutz; Seppo Yla-Herttuala; Nigel R Parker; Colin P N Dinney
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 8.  Optimal treatment of non-muscle invasive urothelial carcinoma including perioperative management revisited.

Authors:  Matthew J Pagano; Gina Badalato; James M McKiernan
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 9.  Experience with newer intravesical chemotherapy for high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  LaMont J Barlow; Mitchell C Benson
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 3.092

10.  Advances in intravesical therapy for the treatment of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (Review).

Authors:  Michael D Weintraub; Qingdi Quentin Li; Piyush K Agarwal
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-06-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.