Literature DB >> 21679982

Treatment trends for stage I renal cell carcinoma.

Matthew R Cooperberg1, Katherine Mallin, Christopher J Kane, Peter R Carroll.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Renal cell carcinoma is increasingly diagnosed at stage I, and among stage I cases mean tumor size has been decreasing. Previous reports suggest that nephron sparing surgery is underused for small renal cell carcinomas. We determined updated, population based treatment trends for stage I renal cell carcinoma.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The National Cancer Data Base, which captures approximately 70% of all cancer diagnoses in the United States, was queried for renal cell carcinoma in adults diagnosed between 1993 and 2007. Trends in treatment, including no surgery, total nephrectomy, partial nephrectomy and focal ablation, were analyzed among all stage I tumors and small stage I tumors categorized by size. Logistic regression was used to identify predictors of nephron sparing surgery (partial nephrectomy or focal ablation).
RESULTS: During the study period we identified 242,740 renal cell carcinomas, of which 127,691 were stage I. For all stage I tumors partial nephrectomy increased from 6.3% to 32.2% of cases and ablation increased from 1.0% to 6.8%. For tumors less than 2.0, 2.0 to 2.9 and 3.0 to 3.9 cm partial nephrectomy increased from 15.3% to 61.1%, 11.0% to 44.2% and 7.2% to 31.1%, respectively (each p<0.001). Female gender, black race, Hispanic ethnicity, lower income, older age and treatment at community hospitals were associated with lower use of nephron sparing.
CONCLUSIONS: While total nephrectomy is still likely overused for small renal cell carcinoma, nephron sparing surgery for stage I renal cell carcinoma has increased substantially in the last 15 years with about 4-fold increases across tumor sizes. These trends appear to be ongoing but sociodemographic disparities exist which must be rectified.
Copyright © 2011 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21679982     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.03.130

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  23 in total

1.  A novel method for texture-mapping conoscopic surfaces for minimally invasive image-guided kidney surgery.

Authors:  Rowena Ong; Courtenay L Glisson; Jessica Burgner-Kahrs; Amber Simpson; Andrei Danilchenko; Ray Lathrop; S Duke Herrell; Robert J Webster; Michael Miga; Robert L Galloway
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  Trends and variations in utilization of nephron-sparing procedures for stage I kidney cancer in the United States.

Authors:  Alexander C Small; Che-Kai Tsao; Erin L Moshier; Benjamin A Gartrell; Juan P Wisnivesky; James Godbold; Guru Sonpavde; Michael A Palese; Simon J Hall; William K Oh; Matthew D Galsky
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 3.  Do we know (or just believe) that partial nephrectomy leads to better survival than radical nephrectomy for renal cancer?

Authors:  Conrad M Tobert; Christopher B Riedinger; Brian R Lane
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: Early single Canadian institution experience.

Authors:  Guillaume Ploussard; Richard Haddad; Evan Kovac; Patrick Richard; Maurice Anidjar; Franck Bladou
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.862

5.  Treatment trends, determinants, and survival of partial and radical nephrectomy for stage I renal cell carcinoma: results from the National Cancer Data Base, 2004-2013.

Authors:  Kyle Plante; Telisa M Stewart; Dongliang Wang; Gennady Bratslavsky; Margaret Formica
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2017-05-26       Impact factor: 2.370

6.  Validation of 3D volumetric-based renal function prediction calculator for nephron sparing surgery.

Authors:  Renato Corradi; Aashish Kabra; Melissa Suarez; Jacob Oppenheimer; Zhamshid Okhunov; Hugh White; Stephanie Nougaret; Hebert A Vargas; Jaime Landman; Jonathan Coleman; Michael A Liss
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2017-02-04       Impact factor: 2.370

7.  Long-term survival following partial vs radical nephrectomy among older patients with early-stage kidney cancer.

Authors:  Hung-Jui Tan; Edward C Norton; Zaojun Ye; Khaled S Hafez; John L Gore; David C Miller
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  National trends in the utilization of partial nephrectomy before and after the establishment of AUA guidelines for the management of renal masses.

Authors:  Marc A Bjurlin; Dawn Walter; Glen B Taksler; William C Huang; James S Wysock; Ganesh Sivarajan; Stacy Loeb; Samir S Taneja; Danil V Makarov
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  Clinical characteristics associated with treatment type for localized renal tumors: implications for practice pattern assessment.

Authors:  Marc C Smaldone; Gauthami Churukanti; Jay Simhan; Simon P Kim; Jose Reyes; Fang Zhu; Alexander Kutikov; Rosalia Viterbo; David Y T Chen; Richard E Greenberg; Robert G Uzzo
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.649

10.  Costs analysis of laparoendoscopic, single-site laparoscopic and open surgery for cT1 renal masses in a European high-volume centre.

Authors:  Giovannalberto Pini; Luigi Ascalone; Francesco Greco; Nasreldin Mohammed; Paolo Fornara
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.