Literature DB >> 21679162

Induction of labor and the risk for emergency cesarean section in nulliparous and multiparous women.

Malin Thorsell1, Sven Lyrenäs, Ellika Andolf, Magnus Kaijser.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the risk for emergency cesarean section among women in whom labor was induced in gestational week ≥41 and to evaluate if parity and mode of induction affected this association.
DESIGN: Hospital-based retrospective cohort study. POPULATION: Singleton pregnancies delivered after ≥41 gestational weeks at Danderyd Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden, during 2002-2006.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Of 23 030 singleton pregnancies meeting the entry criteria, 881 were induced with a Bishop score of <7. Obstetric outcome was assessed through linkage with the Swedish Medical Birth Registry and a local obstetrical database containing information from patients' medical files. Results were adjusted for body mass index, age and the use of epidural analgesia. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Risk for emergency cesarean section.
RESULTS: Among women who were induced, the proportions delivered by emergency cesarean section were 42% for nulliparous and 14% for multiparous. Compared to spontaneous onset, this corresponded to a more than threefold increase in risk for nulliparous women (OR 3.34, 95%CI 2.77-4.04) and an almost twofold increase in risk for multiparous women (OR 1.94, 95%CI 1.24-3.02). There was no significant difference in risk for emergency cesarean section between the two methods of induction (PGE(2) and transcervical catheter).
CONCLUSIONS: Compared to spontaneous onset of delivery, induction of labor is associated with an increased risk for emergency cesarean section both among nulliparous and multiparous women. When labor is induced, the high risk for emergency cesarean must be kept in mind.
© 2011 The Authors Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica© 2011 Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21679162     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0412.2011.01213.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand        ISSN: 0001-6349            Impact factor:   3.636


  11 in total

1.  First do no harm: interventions during childbirth.

Authors:  Lauren Jansen; Martha Gibson; Betty Carlson Bowles; Jane Leach
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2013

Review 2.  Timing of delivery in women with diabetes in pregnancy.

Authors:  Howard Berger; Nir Melamed
Journal:  Obstet Med       Date:  2014-01-15

3.  Why do multiparous women with a history of vaginal delivery give birth by cesarean section?

Authors:  Hale Göksever Çelik; Ayşegül Bestel; Engin Çelik; Alev Atış Aydın
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2016-12-01

4.  Development and Validation of a Risk Prediction Model for Cesarean Delivery After Labor Induction.

Authors:  Valery A Danilack; Jennifer A Hutcheon; Elizabeth W Triche; David D Dore; Janet H Muri; Maureen G Phipps; David A Savitz
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 2.681

5.  Understanding rising caesarean section trends: relevance of inductions and prelabour obstetric interventions at term.

Authors:  A Thaens; A Bonnaerens; G Martens; T Mesens; C Van Holsbeke; E De Jonge; W Gyselaers
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2011

6.  Labor Induction with Orally Administrated Misoprostol: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Tove Wallstrom; Hans Jarnbert-Pettersson; David Stenson; Helena Akerud; Elisabeth Darj; Kristina Gemzell-Danielsson; Eva Wiberg-Itzel
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Prediction of emergency cesarean section by measurable maternal and fetal characteristics.

Authors:  Ping Guan; Fei Tang; Guoqiang Sun; Wei Ren
Journal:  J Investig Med       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 2.895

8.  Caesarean section rates from Malaysian tertiary hospitals using Robson's 10-group classification.

Authors:  Shamala Devi Karalasingam; Ravichandran Jeganathan; Ravindran Jegasothy; Daniel D Reidpath
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  Risk of caesarean section after induced labour: do hospitals make a difference?

Authors:  Cristina Teixeira; Sofia Correia; Henrique Barros
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2013-05-28

10.  Risk factors for cesarean delivery following labor induction in multiparous women.

Authors:  Corine J Verhoeven; Cedric T van Uytrecht; Martina M Porath; Ben Willem J Mol
Journal:  J Pregnancy       Date:  2013-01-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.