Literature DB >> 21677600

Effect of everolimus introduction on cardiac allograft vasculopathy--results of a randomized, multicenter trial.

Satish Arora1, Thor Ueland, Bertil Wennerblom, Vilborg Sigurdadottir, Hans Eiskjær, Hans E Bøtker, Bjorn Ekmehag, Kjell Jansson, Svend-Aage Mortensen, Kari Saunamaki, Svein Simonsen, Einar Gude, Bjørn Bendz, Dag Solbu, Pål Aukrust, Lars Gullestad.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Everolimus reduces the progression of cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) in de novo heart transplant (HTx) recipients, but the influence on established CAV is unknown.
METHODS: In this Nordic Certican Trial in Heart and lung Transplantation substudy, 111 maintenance HTx recipients (time post-HTx 5.8 ± 4.3 years) randomized to everolimus+reduced calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) or standard CNI had matching (intravascular ultrasound) examinations at baseline and 12 months allowing accurate assessment of CAV progression.
RESULTS: No significant difference in CAV progression was evident between the treatment groups (P = 0.30). When considering patients receiving concomitant azathioprine (AZA) therapy (n = 39), CAV progression was attenuated with everolimus versus standard CNI (Δmaximal intimal thickness 0.00 ± 0.04 and 0.04 ± 0.04 mm, Δpercent atheroma volume 0.2% ± 3.0% and 2.6% ± 2.5%, and Δtotal atheroma volume 0.25 ± 14.1 and 19.8 ± 20.4 mm(3), respectively [P < 0.05]). When considering patients receiving mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), accelerated CAV progression occurred with everolimus versus standard CNI (Δmaximal intimal thickness 0.06 ± 0.12 vs. 0.02 ± 0.06 mm and Δpercent atheroma volume 4.0% ± 6.3% vs. 1.4% ± 3.1%, respectively; P < 0.05). The levels of C-reactive protein and vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 declined significantly with AZA+everolimus, whereas MMF+everolimus patients demonstrated a significant increase in levels of C-reactive protein, vascular cell adhesion molecule-1, and von Willebrand factor.
CONCLUSIONS: Conversion to everolimus and reduced CNI does not influence CAV progression among maintenance HTx recipients. However, background immunosuppressive therapy is important as AZA+everolimus patients demonstrated attenuated CAV progression and a decline in inflammatory markers, whereas the opposite pattern was seen with everolimus+MMF. The different effect of everolimus when combined with AZA versus MMF could potentially reflect hitherto unknown interactions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21677600     DOI: 10.1097/TP.0b013e31822057f1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  12 in total

Review 1.  Pediatric heart transplantation: long-term outcomes.

Authors:  Anne I Dipchand; Jessica A Laks
Journal:  Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2019-05-29

2.  Antibodies to HLA Molecules Mimic Agonistic Stimulation to Trigger Vascular Cell Changes and Induce Allograft Injury.

Authors:  Nicole M Valenzuela; Elaine F Reed
Journal:  Curr Transplant Rep       Date:  2015-05-24

3.  New developments for the detection and treatment of cardiac vasculopathy.

Authors:  Kevin J Clerkin; Ziad A Ali; Donna M Mancini
Journal:  Curr Opin Cardiol       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 2.161

Review 4.  Chronic renal insufficiency in heart transplant recipients: risk factors and management options.

Authors:  Francisco González-Vílchez; José Antonio Vázquez de Prada
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  Attenuation of cardiac allograft vasculopathy by sirolimus: Relationship to time interval after heart transplantation.

Authors:  Yoshiki Matsuo; Andrew Cassar; Satoshi Yoshino; Andreas J Flammer; Jing Li; Rajiv Gulati; Yan Topilsky; Eugenia Raichlin; Ryan J Lennon; Lilach O Lerman; Charanjit S Rihal; Sudhir S Kushwaha; Amir Lerman
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 10.247

6.  Immunosuppression and Heart Transplantation.

Authors:  Nilay Sutaria; Lynne Sylvia; David DeNofrio
Journal:  Handb Exp Pharmacol       Date:  2022

Review 7.  Targeting the intragraft microenvironment and the development of chronic allograft rejection.

Authors:  Olivier Dormond; Marc Dufour; Tatsuichiro Seto; Sarah Bruneau; David M Briscoe
Journal:  Hum Immunol       Date:  2012-08-03       Impact factor: 2.850

8.  VEGF-C, VEGF-A and related angiogenesis factors as biomarkers of allograft vasculopathy in cardiac transplant recipients.

Authors:  Kevin P Daly; Michael E Seifert; Anil Chandraker; David Zurakowski; Anju Nohria; Michael M Givertz; S Ananth Karumanchi; David M Briscoe
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 10.247

9.  Reduced Myocardial Flow Reserve by Positron Emission Tomography Predicts Cardiovascular Events After Cardiac Transplantation.

Authors:  Matthew C Konerman; John J Lazarus; Richard L Weinberg; Ravi V Shah; Michael Ghannam; Scott L Hummel; James R Corbett; Edward P Ficaro; Keith D Aaronson; Monica M Colvin; Todd M Koelling; Venkatesh L Murthy
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 8.790

Review 10.  Innate immune mechanisms in transplant allograft vasculopathy.

Authors:  Dan Jane-Wit; Caodi Fang; Daniel R Goldstein
Journal:  Curr Opin Organ Transplant       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 2.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.