BACKGROUND: Various definitions, criteria, tests, and cutoffs have been used to define vitamin B-12 status; however, a need exists for the systematic study of vitamin B-12 status in the United States because of concerns about high folic acid intakes and the potential for associated adverse effects. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to determine the effect of different cutoff choices on outcomes and of the different degrees of serum vitamin B-12 status, definable by the concurrent use of a functional and circulating marker as the first steps to developing a data-based consensus on the biochemical diagnosis of vitamin B-12 deficiency. DESIGN: Data from NHANES, a nationally representative cross-sectional survey, were examined for adults aged >19 y (mean ± SD age: 45 ± 1 y) from 1999 to 2004 (n = 12,612). RESULTS: Commonly used cutoffs had a greater effect on prevalence estimates of low vitamin B-12 status with the use of vitamin B-12 than with the use of methylmalonic acid (MMA; 3-26% and 2-6%, respectively). A cutoff of >148 pmol/L for vitamin B-12 and of ≤210 nmol/L for MMA resulted in significant misclassifications. Approximately 1% of adults had a clear vitamin B-12 deficiency (low vitamin B-12 and elevated MMA); 92% of adults had adequate vitamin B-12 status. A high percentage of younger women characterized the group with low vitamin B-12 and normal MMA (2% of adults) and may have falsely reflected low vitamin B-12. Adults with elevated MMA (5%) only were demographically similar (ie, by age and race) to the deficient group and may have included some individuals with early vitamin B-12 deficiency. CONCLUSIONS: These analyses indicate the challenges of assessing vitamin B-12 status when uncertainties exist about the appropriate cutoffs. Future studies should determine definable endpoints to achieve this goal.
BACKGROUND: Various definitions, criteria, tests, and cutoffs have been used to define vitamin B-12 status; however, a need exists for the systematic study of vitamin B-12 status in the United States because of concerns about high folic acid intakes and the potential for associated adverse effects. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to determine the effect of different cutoff choices on outcomes and of the different degrees of serum vitamin B-12 status, definable by the concurrent use of a functional and circulating marker as the first steps to developing a data-based consensus on the biochemical diagnosis of vitamin B-12 deficiency. DESIGN: Data from NHANES, a nationally representative cross-sectional survey, were examined for adults aged >19 y (mean ± SD age: 45 ± 1 y) from 1999 to 2004 (n = 12,612). RESULTS: Commonly used cutoffs had a greater effect on prevalence estimates of low vitamin B-12 status with the use of vitamin B-12 than with the use of methylmalonic acid (MMA; 3-26% and 2-6%, respectively). A cutoff of >148 pmol/L for vitamin B-12 and of ≤210 nmol/L for MMA resulted in significant misclassifications. Approximately 1% of adults had a clear vitamin B-12 deficiency (low vitamin B-12 and elevated MMA); 92% of adults had adequate vitamin B-12 status. A high percentage of younger women characterized the group with low vitamin B-12 and normal MMA (2% of adults) and may have falsely reflected low vitamin B-12. Adults with elevated MMA (5%) only were demographically similar (ie, by age and race) to the deficient group and may have included some individuals with early vitamin B-12 deficiency. CONCLUSIONS: These analyses indicate the challenges of assessing vitamin B-12 status when uncertainties exist about the appropriate cutoffs. Future studies should determine definable endpoints to achieve this goal.
Authors: Suparna Rajan; Jeffrey I Wallace; Shirley A A Beresford; Kayla I Brodkin; Robert A Allen; Sally P Stabler Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2002-04 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Robert Clarke; J Grimley Evans; J Schneede; E Nexo; C Bates; A Fletcher; A Prentice; C Johnston; P M Ueland; H Refsum; P Sherliker; J Birks; G Whitlock; E Breeze; J M Scott Journal: Age Ageing Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 10.668
Authors: Lindsay H Allen; Joshua W Miller; Lisette de Groot; Irwin H Rosenberg; A David Smith; Helga Refsum; Daniel J Raiten Journal: J Nutr Date: 2018-12-01 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: E Laird; M C Casey; M Ward; L Hoey; C F Hughes; K McCarroll; C Cunningham; J J Strain; H McNulty; A M Molloy Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2017 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: J P van Wijngaarden; R A M Dhonukshe-Rutten; E M Brouwer-Brolsma; A W Enneman; K M A Swart; S C van Dijk; P H In 't Veld; N M van Schoor; N van der Velde; R de Jonge; P Lips; A G Uitterlinden; L C P G M de Groot Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2017 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: Christine M Pfeiffer; David A Lacher; Rosemary L Schleicher; Clifford L Johnson; Elizabeth A Yetley Journal: Adv Nutr Date: 2017-03-15 Impact factor: 8.701
Authors: Regan L Bailey; Ramon A Durazo-Arvizu; Ralph Carmel; Ralph Green; Christine M Pfeiffer; Christopher T Sempos; Alicia Carriquiry; Elizabeth A Yetley Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2013-06-26 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Anne M Molloy; Faith Pangilinan; James L Mills; Barry Shane; Mary B O'Neill; David M McGaughey; Aneliya Velkova; Hatice Ozel Abaan; Per M Ueland; Helene McNulty; Mary Ward; J J Strain; Conal Cunningham; Miriam Casey; Cheryl D Cropp; Yoonhee Kim; Joan E Bailey-Wilson; Alexander F Wilson; Lawrence C Brody Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2016-04-28 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Christine M Pfeiffer; Maya R Sternberg; Rosemary L Schleicher; Bridgette M H Haynes; Michael E Rybak; James L Pirkle Journal: J Nutr Date: 2013-04-17 Impact factor: 4.798