BACKGROUND: In the Netherlands, GPs performed euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide (EAS) in ∼1 of 10 end-of-life cancer patients in their care. Of all explicit requests for EAS directed at GPs, ∼44% resulted in EAS. However, the suffering of patients who do and do not request EAS has never been studied. An important barrier for such research is the low prevalence of end-of-life cancer patients per practice (on average two/year). We studied whether it is possible to recruit end-of-life cancer patients, following-up for requests for EAS (if any), in an interview study in general practice, whether selection occurred and which were the threats and opportunities to recruitment. Our target was to recruit at least 50 patients. METHODS: Characteristics of all eligible patients were monitored. RESULTS: One in every three eligible patients were recruited by 44 GPs in a 3-year inclusion period, resulting in 64 patients in the interview study with follow-up until death. The prevalence of explicit requests for EAS was higher (27%; P = 0.026) in the interview sample, and the presence of a depressed mood according to the GP was lower (5%; P = 0.013) than in the sample with eligible but not participating patients. CONCLUSIONS: Recruitment of slightly more than the minimal target number of end-of-life cancer patients in this study in general practice was realized. Monitoring of all eligible patients permitted to evaluate the selection which occurred. Recruitment through GPs who were direct professional colleagues of one of the researchers was a positive recruitment factor.
BACKGROUND: In the Netherlands, GPs performed euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide (EAS) in ∼1 of 10 end-of-life cancerpatients in their care. Of all explicit requests for EAS directed at GPs, ∼44% resulted in EAS. However, the suffering of patients who do and do not request EAS has never been studied. An important barrier for such research is the low prevalence of end-of-life cancerpatients per practice (on average two/year). We studied whether it is possible to recruit end-of-life cancerpatients, following-up for requests for EAS (if any), in an interview study in general practice, whether selection occurred and which were the threats and opportunities to recruitment. Our target was to recruit at least 50 patients. METHODS: Characteristics of all eligible patients were monitored. RESULTS: One in every three eligible patients were recruited by 44 GPs in a 3-year inclusion period, resulting in 64 patients in the interview study with follow-up until death. The prevalence of explicit requests for EAS was higher (27%; P = 0.026) in the interview sample, and the presence of a depressed mood according to the GP was lower (5%; P = 0.013) than in the sample with eligible but not participating patients. CONCLUSIONS: Recruitment of slightly more than the minimal target number of end-of-life cancerpatients in this study in general practice was realized. Monitoring of all eligible patients permitted to evaluate the selection which occurred. Recruitment through GPs who were direct professional colleagues of one of the researchers was a positive recruitment factor.
Authors: Cees Dm Ruijs; Gerrit van der Wal; Ad Jfm Kerkhof; Bregje D Onwuteaka-Philipsen Journal: BMC Palliat Care Date: 2014-12-23 Impact factor: 3.234
Authors: Stéphanie Giezendanner; Corinna Jung; Hans-Ruedi Banderet; Ina Carola Otte; Heike Gudat; Dagmar M Haller; Bernice S Elger; Elisabeth Zemp; Klaus Bally Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-02-01 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Cees Dm Ruijs; Ad Jfm Kerkhof; Gerrit van der Wal; Bregje D Onwuteaka-Philipsen Journal: BMC Palliat Care Date: 2012-08-01 Impact factor: 3.234
Authors: Cees D M Ruijs; Ad J F M Kerkhof; Gerrit van der Wal; Bregje D Onwuteaka-Philipsen Journal: BMC Fam Pract Date: 2013-12-28 Impact factor: 2.497