Literature DB >> 21676915

Multipoint incremental motor unit number estimation as an outcome measure in ALS.

J M Shefner1, M L Watson, L Simionescu, J B Caress, T M Burns, N J Maragakis, M Benatar, W S David, K R Sharma, S B Rutkove.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Improved outcome measures are necessary to reduce sample size and increase power in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) clinical trials. Motor unit number estimation (MUNE) is a potentially attractive tool. MUNE methods previously employed in multicenter trials exhibited excessive variability and were prone to artifact.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a modification of standard incremental MUNE in a multicenter natural history study of subjects with ALS.
METHODS: Fifty healthy subjects were evaluated twice and 71 subjects with ALS were studied repeatedly for up to 500 days. Side and nerve studied was based on clinical examination findings. Nerves were stimulated at 3 specified locations and 3 increments were obtained at each location. Average single motor unit action potential (SMUP) amplitude was calculated by adding the amplitude of the third increment at each location and dividing by 9; SMUP was divided into maximum CMAP amplitude to determine the MUNE.
RESULTS: Test-retest variability was 9% in normal subjects. Average MUNE for normal subjects was 225 (±87), and was 41.9 (±39) among subjects with ALS at baseline. Subjects with ALS showed clear decrements over time, with an overage rate of decline of approximately 9% per month. SMUP amplitude increased with time in a fashion consistent with the known pathophysiology of ALS.
CONCLUSION: Multipoint incremental MUNE has a number of attributes that make it attractive as an outcome measure in ALS and other diseases characterized by motor unit loss. It can be rapidly performed on any EMG machine and has repeatability and rates of decline that favorably compare to other previously described methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21676915      PMCID: PMC3136054          DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318225aabf

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurology        ISSN: 0028-3878            Impact factor:   9.910


  21 in total

1.  Comparison of multiple point and statistical motor unit number estimation.

Authors:  C Lomen-Hoerth; R K Olney
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.217

2.  Number and relative size of thenar motor units in ALS patients: application of the adapted multiple point stimulation method.

Authors:  F C Wang; P J Delwaide
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-02

3.  Changes in motor unit numbers in patients with ALS: a longitudinal study using the adapted multiple point stimulation method.

Authors:  F C Wang; O Bouquiaux; V De Pasqua; P J Delwaide
Journal:  Amyotroph Lateral Scler Other Motor Neuron Disord       Date:  2002-03

4.  The extent and time course of motoneuron involvement in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

Authors:  M Dantes; A McComas
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 3.217

5.  Number and relative size of thenar motor units estimated by an adapted multiple point stimulation method.

Authors:  F C Wang; P J Delwaide
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 3.217

6.  Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Electrophysiologic study (number of motor units and rate of decay of motor units).

Authors:  W F Brown; N Jaatoul
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  1974-03

7.  Motor unit estimation: reproducibility of the spike-triggered averaging technique in normal and ALS subjects.

Authors:  M B Bromberg
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 3.217

8.  Determinants of mean motor unit size: impact on estimates of motor unit number.

Authors:  T J Doherty; D W Stashuk; W F Brown
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 3.217

Review 9.  Motor unit number estimation in human neurological diseases and animal models.

Authors:  J M Shefner
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.708

10.  The use of statistical MUNE in a multicenter clinical trial.

Authors:  J M Shefner; M E Cudkowicz; H Zhang; D Schoenfeld; D Jillapalli
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.217

View more
  37 in total

1.  Techniques and applications of EMG: measuring motor units from structure to function.

Authors:  Rachel C Thornton; Andrew W Michell
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 2.  Use of biomarkers in ALS drug development and clinical trials.

Authors:  Nadine Bakkar; Ashley Boehringer; Robert Bowser
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2014-10-24       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 3.  Challenges in the Understanding and Treatment of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis/Motor Neuron Disease.

Authors:  Jeffrey Rosenfeld; Michael J Strong
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 7.620

Review 4.  Presymptomatic studies in ALS: rationale, challenges, and approach.

Authors:  Michael Benatar; Joanne Wuu
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 9.910

5.  Tongue electrical impedance in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis modeled using the finite element method.

Authors:  Adam Pacheck; Alex Mijailovic; Sung Yim; Jia Li; Jordan R Green; Courtney E McIlduff; Seward B Rutkove
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 6.  Clinical Measures of Disease Progression in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.

Authors:  Seward B Rutkove
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 7.620

Review 7.  Segmentation of the human spinal cord.

Authors:  Benjamin De Leener; Manuel Taso; Julien Cohen-Adad; Virginie Callot
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2016-01-02       Impact factor: 2.310

8.  Stem cell derived phenotypic human neuromuscular junction model for dose response evaluation of therapeutics.

Authors:  Navaneetha Santhanam; Lee Kumanchik; Xiufang Guo; Frank Sommerhage; Yunqing Cai; Max Jackson; Candace Martin; George Saad; Christopher W McAleer; Ying Wang; Andrea Lavado; Christopher J Long; James J Hickman
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 9.  ALS biomarkers for therapy development: State of the field and future directions.

Authors:  Michael Benatar; Kevin Boylan; Andreas Jeromin; Seward B Rutkove; James Berry; Nazem Atassi; Lucie Bruijn
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 3.217

Review 10.  Assessment of Motor Units in Neuromuscular Disease.

Authors:  Robert D Henderson; Pamela A McCombe
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 7.620

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.