Literature DB >> 21676785

How and When Selection Experiments Might Actually be Useful.

Rebecca C Fuller1, Charles F Baer, Joseph Travis.   

Abstract

Laboratory natural selection and artificial selection are vital tools for addressing specific questions about evolutionary patterns of variation. Laboratory natural selection can illuminate whether a putative selective agent is capable of generating long-term, sustained changes in individual traits and suites of traits. Artificial selection is the essential tool for understanding the general evolvability of traits and the extent to which genetic correlations constrain evolution. We review the contexts in which each type of experiment seems capable of offering key insights into important evolutionary issues. We also discuss theoretical and methodological considerations that play critical roles in designing selection experiments that are relevant to evolutionary patterns of trait variation. In particular, we focus on the critical role of selection intensity and the consequences of experiments with different intensities. While selection experiments are not practical in many cases, sophisticated selection experiments-designed with careful consideration of the theory of selection-should be taken beyond model organisms and used in well-chosen natural systems to understand natural patterns of variation.

Year:  2005        PMID: 21676785     DOI: 10.1093/icb/45.3.391

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Integr Comp Biol        ISSN: 1540-7063            Impact factor:   3.326


  27 in total

1.  Adaptations to sexual selection and sexual conflict: insights from experimental evolution and artificial selection.

Authors:  Dominic A Edward; Claudia Fricke; Tracey Chapman
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-08-27       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  Hormone-mediated suites as adaptations and evolutionary constraints.

Authors:  Joel W McGlothlin; Ellen D Ketterson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-05-12       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Does reproductive isolation evolve faster in larger populations via sexually antagonistic coevolution?

Authors:  L Gay; P E Eady; R Vasudev; D J Hosken; T Tregenza
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 3.703

4.  Reversal of evolutionary downsizing caused by selective harvest of large fish.

Authors:  David O Conover; Stephan B Munch; Stephen A Arnott
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 5.  Comparative digestive physiology.

Authors:  William H Karasov; Angela E Douglas
Journal:  Compr Physiol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 9.090

Review 6.  Quantitative genetics approaches to study evolutionary processes in ecotoxicology; a perspective from research on the evolution of resistance.

Authors:  Paul L Klerks; Lingtian Xie; Jeffrey S Levinton
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2011-03-29       Impact factor: 2.823

7.  Cellular basis of morphological variation and temperature-related plasticity in Drosophila melanogaster strains with divergent wing shapes.

Authors:  Libéria Souza Torquato; Daniel Mattos; Bruna Palma Matta; Blanche Christine Bitner-Mathé
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2014-10-19       Impact factor: 1.082

8.  A strong response to selection on mass-independent maximal metabolic rate without a correlated response in basal metabolic rate.

Authors:  B W M Wone; P Madsen; E R Donovan; M K Labocha; M W Sears; C J Downs; D A Sorensen; J P Hayes
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 3.821

9.  Effect of expanded variation in anther position on pollinator visitation to wild radish, Raphanus raphanistrum.

Authors:  Yuval Sapir; Keith Karoly; Vanessa A Koelling; Heather F Sahli; Frances N Knapczyk; Jeffrey K Conner
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 4.357

10.  An analysis of the relative roles of plasticity and natural selection in the morphology and performance of a lizard (Urosaurus ornatus).

Authors:  Duncan J Irschick; Jerry Jay Meyers
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2007-04-24       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.