OBJECTIVES: Secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor (SLPI) is amplified in serous ovarian cancer. We have dissected its function, showing it is a survival factor for ovarian cancer and promotes tumorigenesis and paclitaxel-resistance. We hypothesized that the protease inhibitory function was responsible for modulating SLPI's invasive capacity. METHODS: Stable HEYA8 ovarian cancer transfectants expressing vector, wild type SLPI, and protease inhibitor null (F-)SLPI were examined in vitro and in xenografts. Invasion, enzyme activity, and MMP production and function assays were applied. SLPI and MMP immunoexpression was graded on tissue microarray and clinical samples. Statistical comparisons used unpaired t test and ANOVA, where appropriate. RESULTS: SLPI and F-SLPI cells caused greater parenchymal and peritoneal dissemination over control cells in xenografts and invasion assays (p<0.001). MMP-9 protease activity was increased in SLPI and F-SLPI cells over control. SLPI, but not F-SLPI, inhibited plasmin activity, necessary for MMP-9 activation and release, and inhibited activation of MMP-9. However, paradoxically, both induced quantitative MMP-9 transcription (p<0.05) and protein (p<0.008), yielding an increased net MMP-9 activity in the face of plasmin inhibition. SLPI and MMP-9 expression were strongly correlated in serous ovarian cancers (r(2)=0.986) and a set of ovarian cancers (p<0.02). SLPI expression was greater in serous than endometrioid ovarian cancers (p=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: SLPI stimulates ovarian cancer invasion, modulated in part by its serine protease inhibitory activity attenuating MMP-9 release. However, SLPI induction of MMP-9, independent of protease inhibition activity, is greater yielding a net pro-invasive behavior. These findings further support SLPI as a molecular target for ovarian cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc.
OBJECTIVES: Secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor (SLPI) is amplified in serous ovarian cancer. We have dissected its function, showing it is a survival factor for ovarian cancer and promotes tumorigenesis and paclitaxel-resistance. We hypothesized that the protease inhibitory function was responsible for modulating SLPI's invasive capacity. METHODS: Stable HEYA8 ovarian cancer transfectants expressing vector, wild type SLPI, and protease inhibitor null (F-)SLPI were examined in vitro and in xenografts. Invasion, enzyme activity, and MMP production and function assays were applied. SLPI and MMP immunoexpression was graded on tissue microarray and clinical samples. Statistical comparisons used unpaired t test and ANOVA, where appropriate. RESULTS:SLPI and F-SLPI cells caused greater parenchymal and peritoneal dissemination over control cells in xenografts and invasion assays (p<0.001). MMP-9 protease activity was increased in SLPI and F-SLPI cells over control. SLPI, but not F-SLPI, inhibited plasmin activity, necessary for MMP-9 activation and release, and inhibited activation of MMP-9. However, paradoxically, both induced quantitative MMP-9 transcription (p<0.05) and protein (p<0.008), yielding an increased net MMP-9 activity in the face of plasmin inhibition. SLPI and MMP-9 expression were strongly correlated in serous ovarian cancers (r(2)=0.986) and a set of ovarian cancers (p<0.02). SLPI expression was greater in serous than endometrioid ovarian cancers (p=0.04). CONCLUSIONS:SLPI stimulates ovarian cancer invasion, modulated in part by its serine protease inhibitory activity attenuating MMP-9 release. However, SLPI induction of MMP-9, independent of protease inhibition activity, is greater yielding a net pro-invasive behavior. These findings further support SLPI as a molecular target for ovarian cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Authors: S Uttamsingh; X Bao; K T Nguyen; M Bhanot; J Gong; J L-K Chan; F Liu; T T Chu; L-H Wang Journal: Oncogene Date: 2007-11-05 Impact factor: 9.867
Authors: Nick Devoogdt; Gholamreza Hassanzadeh Ghassabeh; Jing Zhang; Lea Brys; Patrick De Baetselier; Hilde Revets Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2003-05-05 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Esra Fakioglu; Sarah S Wilson; Pedro M M Mesquita; Ehsan Hazrati; Natalia Cheshenko; John A Blaho; Betsy C Herold Journal: J Virol Date: 2008-07-30 Impact factor: 5.103
Authors: Martin Köbel; Steve E Kalloger; Niki Boyd; Steven McKinney; Erika Mehl; Chana Palmer; Samuel Leung; Nathan J Bowen; Diana N Ionescu; Ashish Rajput; Leah M Prentice; Dianne Miller; Jennifer Santos; Kenneth Swenerton; C Blake Gilks; David Huntsman Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2008-12-02 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: Steven J Ressler; Truong D Dang; Samuel M Wu; Dennis Y Tse; Brian E Gilbert; Annapurna Vyakarnam; Feng Yang; Isaiah G Schauer; David A Barron; David R Rowley Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 2014-09-16 Impact factor: 4.307
Authors: Yao Chen; Liping Huang; Suihai Wang; Ji-Liang Li; Ming Li; Yingsong Wu; Tiancai Liu Journal: Cancer Manag Res Date: 2019-03-27 Impact factor: 3.989