Literature DB >> 21676442

Does pelvicaliceal system anatomy affect success of percutaneous nephrolithotomy?

Murat Binbay1, Tolga Akman, Faruk Ozgor, Ozgur Yazici, Erhan Sari, Akif Erbin, Cem Kezer, Omer Sarilar, Yalcın Berberoglu, Ahmet Yaser Muslumanoglu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of the pelvicaliceal system (PCS) anatomy on the percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) success rate. Although the caliceal anatomy is effective for stone clearance after shock wave lithotripsy and retrograde intrarenal lithotripsy, the effect of the caliceal anatomy after PCNL has not been evaluated to date.
METHODS: A total of 498 patients who had undergone PCNL and preoperative intravenous urography were enrolled in our study. Kidney-related anatomic factors, such as the PCS surface area and type, degree of hydronephrosis, infundibulopelvic angle, upper-lower calix angle, infundibular length, and infundibular width were calculated using intravenous urography. The association between the PCNL success rate and kidney-related anatomic factors was retrospectively analyzed using chi-square tests, Fisher's exact test, Mann-Whitney U test, and forward stepwise regression analysis.
RESULTS: A success rate of 78.1% was achieved. No difference was seen the success rates among the PCS types. The mean PCS surface area was 20.1 ± 9.7 cm(2) in patients with successful outcomes and 24.5 ± 10.2 cm(2) in patients with remaining stones (P = .001). The mean infundibulopelvic angle, upper-lower calix angle, infundibular length, and infundibular width were similar in both groups. Multivariate binary logistic regression analysis showed that stone configuration and PCS surface area were independent factors affecting the PCNL success rates.
CONCLUSION: The results of our study have shown that the PCS surface area is the only anatomic factor that affects the PCNL success rate and patients with a PCS surface area <20.5 cm(2) have greater PCNL success.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21676442     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.03.058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  10 in total

1.  Nephrolithometric Scoring Systems to Predict Outcomes of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Simone L Vernez; Zhamshid Okhunov; Piruz Motamedinia; Vincent Bird; Zeph Okeke; Arthur Smith
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2016

2.  Stone scattering during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: role of renal anatomical characteristics.

Authors:  Alireza Aminsharifi; Ali Eslahi; Ali Reza Safarpour; Sasan Mehrabi
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 3.  Predictability and Practicality of Image-Based Scoring Systems for Patient Assessment and Outcome Stratification During Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: a Contemporary Update.

Authors:  Linda My Huynh; Erica Huang; Roshan M Patel; Zhamshid Okhunov
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 3.092

4.  Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: yes but when? A multicentre retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Murat M Rifaioglu; Kadir Onem; Ibrahim Buldu; Tuna Karatag; Mustafa Okan Istanbulluoglu
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 3.436

5.  Management of anterior caliceal stones >15 mm.

Authors:  M El-Shazly; M Aziz; M Omar; O Al-Hunaidi; A R El-Nahas
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 3.436

6.  Seoul National University Renal Stone Complexity Score for Predicting Stone-Free Rate after Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Chang Wook Jeong; Jin-Woo Jung; Woo Heon Cha; Byung Ki Lee; Sangchul Lee; Seong Jin Jeong; Sung Kyu Hong; Seok-Soo Byun; Sang Eun Lee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Complex multiple renal calculi: stone distribution, pelvicalyceal anatomy and site of puncture as predictors of PCNL outcome.

Authors:  Amit Verma; Vinay Tomar; Shersingh Yadav
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-08-17

8.  Modified Takazawa anatomical classification of renal pelvicalyceal system based on three-dimensional virtual reconstruction models.

Authors:  Weijie Zhu; Mengmeng Zheng; Shengwei Xiong; Guanpeng Han; Chang Meng; Zhihua Li; Lei Zhang; Gengyan Xiong; Hua Guan; Yanbo Huang; Hongjian Zhu; Xuesong Li; Gang Wang; Liqun Zhou
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2021-07

9.  A prospective, single-centered, cohort study comparing the treatment of renal stones by following PCNL types: Standard, tubeless & totally tubeless.

Authors:  Mumtaz Ahmad; Hassan Mumtaz; Hassan-Ul Hussain; Sharjeel Sarfraz; Manahil Rahat; Shamim Mumtaz
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2022-08-04

10.  Influence of the Anatomy of the Collecting System Upon Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Removal of Renal Staghorn Stones.

Authors:  Bo Xiao; Xiao-Lin Diao; Wei-Guo Hu; Xin Zhang; Song Chen; Yu-Bao Liu; Yu-Zhe Tang; Wen-Jie Bai; Jian-Xing Li
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 2.628

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.