Literature DB >> 21676433

Correlation between genomic alterations assessed by array comparative genomic hybridization, prognostically informative histologic subtype, stage, and patient survival in gastric cancer.

Elena Rossi1, Catherine Klersy, Rachele Manca, Orsetta Zuffardi, Enrico Solcia.   

Abstract

It is difficult to evaluate the prognostic value of histologic criteria in gastric cancer because of the high variability of morphologic patterns. Recently, histologic subtypes of low, intermediate, or high malignant potential have been identified, providing the basis for a prognostically informative grading system. Because array comparative genomic hybridization systems allow systematic analysis of chromosome alterations, which may be prognostically and pathogenetically informative, we applied high-resolution genome-wide array comparative genomic hybridization to archival material from 81 gastric cancer cases followed for a median of 150 months after surgery. The DNA extracted from paraffin sections gave useful results in 49 tumors, 18 of which were of low-grade, 24 of intermediate, and 7 of high-grade histotypes. Based on the number of chromosome aberrations and the presence/absence of amplifications, 3 tumor clusters of increasing genomic lesion severity were constructed, which proved to correlate significantly with histologic grade and stage as well as with patient survival. Further investigation documented the lower number and severity of genomic alterations in tumors with microsatellite DNA instability and high CD8-rich lymphoid response; the close association of 8p23.1 amplification with cardial cancer; the frequent amplification of genes involved in cell renewal (CDC6, HER2, GRB7, IGFBP4) at 17q12-q21.1, with close histochemical correlation with HER2 membranous expression; and more sporadic amplification of chromosome regions harboring important oncogenes like MYC, KRAS, NRAS, CRKL, CCNE1, or ZNF217. We conclude that genome-wide array comparative genomic hybridization of gastric cancer contributes prognostically relevant information providing a genetic background for histologic grading.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21676433     DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2011.02.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Pathol        ISSN: 0046-8177            Impact factor:   3.466


  16 in total

1.  Histotype-based prognostic classification of gastric cancer.

Authors:  Anna Maria Chiaravalli; Catherine Klersy; Alessandro Vanoli; Andrea Ferretti; Carlo Capella; Enrico Solcia
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Identification of a 5-gene signature for clinical and prognostic prediction in gastric cancer patients upon microarray data.

Authors:  Zhigang Wang; Zhi Yan; Bicheng Zhang; Zhiguo Rao; Yafei Zhang; Jian Liu; Lifang Yu; Yong Zhao; Bo Yang; Tingting Wu; Jianfei Gao
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2013-08-03       Impact factor: 3.064

3.  CDC6 is up-regulated and a poor prognostic signature in glioblastoma multiforme.

Authors:  H Zhao; X Zhou; G Yuan; Z Hou; H Sun; N Zhai; B Huang; X Li
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 3.405

4.  Gastrointestinal adenocarcinomas of the esophagus, stomach, and colon exhibit distinct patterns of genome instability and oncogenesis.

Authors:  Austin M Dulak; Steven E Schumacher; Jasper van Lieshout; Yu Imamura; Cameron Fox; Byoungyong Shim; Alex H Ramos; Gordon Saksena; Sylvan C Baca; Jose Baselga; Josep Tabernero; Jordi Barretina; Peter C Enzinger; Giovanni Corso; Franco Roviello; Lin Lin; Santhoshi Bandla; James D Luketich; Arjun Pennathur; Matthew Meyerson; Shuji Ogino; Ramesh A Shivdasani; David G Beer; Tony E Godfrey; Rameen Beroukhim; Adam J Bass
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2012-07-02       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  The contribution of cell phenotype to the behavior of gastric cancer.

Authors:  Enrico Solcia; Catherine Klersy; Alessandro Vanoli; Federica Grillo; Rachele Manca; Francesca Tava; Ombretta Luinetti; Roberto Fiocca
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 7.370

Review 6.  Perspectives on new biomarkers in gastric cancer: diagnostic and prognostic applications.

Authors:  Danilo do Rosário Pinheiro; Wallax Augusto Silva Ferreira; Mariceli Baia Leão Barros; Mariana Diniz Araújo; Symara Rodrigues-Antunes; Bárbara do Nascimento Borges
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-09-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 7.  Genetic aspects of gastric cancer instability.

Authors:  Petra Hudler
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2012-04-19

8.  Frequent gene amplification predicts poor prognosis in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Jing Shi; Demao Yao; Wei Liu; Na Wang; Hongjun Lv; Nongyue He; Bingyin Shi; Peng Hou; Meiju Ji
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2012-04-13       Impact factor: 6.208

9.  Amplification of the UQCRFS1 Gene in Gastric Cancers.

Authors:  Kyong Hwa Jun; Su Young Kim; Jung Hwan Yoon; Jae Hwi Song; Won Sang Park
Journal:  J Gastric Cancer       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 3.720

10.  High quality genomic copy number data from archival formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded leiomyosarcoma: optimisation of universal linkage system labelling.

Authors:  Abdulazeez Salawu; Aliya Ul-Hassan; David Hammond; Malee Fernando; Malcolm Reed; Karen Sisley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.