Literature DB >> 21676193

Molecular scatology: how to improve prey DNA detection success in avian faeces?

Johannes Oehm1, Anita Juen, Karin Nagiller, Sigrid Neuhauser, Michael Traugott.   

Abstract

The analysis of prey DNA in faeces is a non-invasive approach to examine the diet of birds. However, it is poorly known how gut transition time, environmental factors and laboratory treatments such as storage conditions or DNA extraction procedures affect the detection success of prey DNA. Here, we examined several of these factors using faeces from carrion crows fed with insect larvae. Faeces produced between 30 min and 4 h post-feeding tested positive for insect DNA, representing the gut transition time. Prey detection was not only possible in fresh but also in 5-day-old faeces. The type of surface the faeces were placed on for these 5 days, however, affected prey DNA detection success: samples placed on soil provided the lowest rate of positives compared to faeces left on leaves, on branches and within plastic tubes. Exposing faeces to sunlight and rain significantly lowered prey DNA detection rates (17% and 68% positives in exposed and protected samples, respectively). Storing faeces in ethanol or in the freezer did not affect molecular prey detection. Extracting DNA directly from larger pieces of faecal pellets resulted in significantly higher prey detection rates than when using small amounts of homogenized faeces. A cetyltrimethyl ammonium bromide-based DNA extraction protocol yielded significantly higher DNA detection rates (60%) than three commercial kits, however, for small amounts of homogenized faeces only. Our results suggest that collecting faeces from smooth, clean and non-absorbing surfaces, protected from sunlight and rain, improves DNA detection success in avian faeces.
© 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21676193     DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2011.03001.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour        ISSN: 1755-098X            Impact factor:   7.090


  22 in total

1.  Bacterial microbiota similarity between predators and prey in a blue tit trophic network.

Authors:  Hélène Dion-Phénix; Anne Charmantier; Christophe de Franceschi; Geneviève Bourret; Steven W Kembel; Denis Réale
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 10.302

2.  Use of length heterogeneity polymerase chain reaction (LH-PCR) as non-invasive approach for dietary analysis of Svalbard reindeer, Rangifer tarandus platyrhynchus.

Authors:  Sungbae Joo; Donguk Han; Eun Ju Lee; Sangkyu Park
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Molecular diagnosis of bird-mediated pest consumption in tropical farmland.

Authors:  Daniel S Karp; Seth Judson; Gretchen C Daily; Elizabeth A Hadly
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2014-10-24

4.  Persistence of DNA in carcasses, slime and avian feces may affect interpretation of environmental DNA data.

Authors:  Christopher M Merkes; S Grace McCalla; Nathan R Jensen; Mark P Gaikowski; Jon J Amberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-17       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Molecular prey identification in Central European piscivores.

Authors:  Bettina Thalinger; Johannes Oehm; Hannes Mayr; Armin Obwexer; Christiane Zeisler; Michael Traugott
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2015-06-21       Impact factor: 7.090

6.  Diet analysis in piscivorous birds: What can the addition of molecular tools offer?

Authors:  Johannes Oehm; Bettina Thalinger; Stephanie Eisenkölbl; Michael Traugott
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Optimizing methods for PCR-based analysis of predation.

Authors:  Daniela Sint; Lorna Raso; Rüdiger Kaufmann; Michael Traugott
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 7.090

8.  Using Next-Generation Sequencing to Contrast the Diet and Explore Pest-Reduction Services of Sympatric Bird Species in Macadamia Orchards in Australia.

Authors:  Eduardo Crisol-Martínez; Laura T Moreno-Moyano; Kevin R Wormington; Philip H Brown; Dragana Stanley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Evaluation of an automated protocol for efficient and reliable DNA extraction of dietary samples.

Authors:  Corinna Wallinger; Karin Staudacher; Daniela Sint; Bettina Thalinger; Johannes Oehm; Anita Juen; Michael Traugott
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-07-07       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  Winter bait stations as a multispecies survey tool.

Authors:  Lacy Robinson; Samuel A Cushman; Michael K Lucid
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 2.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.