INTRODUCTION: Sexual disorders in women with diabetes mellitus (DM) may not necessarily have only the biological etiology. AIMS: To establish the mediators of sexual functions in the population of women with DM. METHODS: Five hundred seventeen females, aged 18-55 years old, were included in a questionnaire-based, cross-sectional study. This is the second part of the study on sexual functions in females with DM where only females with DM (n=242) were analyzed. Sexual functions were compared between women with type 1 (n=109) and type 2 DM (N=133). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: To assess reported female sexual functions by using the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) in women with type 1 and type 2 DM. To establish the risk factors of female sexual dysfunction (FSD) in women with DM by using multivariate logistic regression model. RESULTS: Sexual dysfunction was diagnosed in 32.65% (n=64) of women with DM. Women with type 2 DM had a significantly lower number of points scored in all FSFI domains except pain compared to type 1 respondents. The only variables associated with DM significantly influencing sexual functioning were: type 2 diabetes in desire, arousal, as well as in global FSD (odds ratio [OR]=1.40; 2.70 and 3.31, respectively), the presence of retinopathy in lubrication (OR=7.8), and treatment with insulin in satisfaction domain (OR=0.29). Neither the presence of comorbidities, the duration of diabetes, the presence of diabetes complications nor the glycemic control was a moderator of FSD. The strongest significant predictors of FSD were: the presence of depressive symptoms, the importance of sex to the respondent, and satisfaction with the partner as a lover. CONCLUSIONS: Women with DM, especially type 2, are at risk of sexual dysfunctions. Diabetes-related factors have little impact on sexual functions in women with DM. Depressive symptoms, partner-related factors, and individual perception of sexuality should be evaluated when counseling females with DM.
INTRODUCTION:Sexual disorders in women with diabetes mellitus (DM) may not necessarily have only the biological etiology. AIMS: To establish the mediators of sexual functions in the population of women with DM. METHODS: Five hundred seventeen females, aged 18-55 years old, were included in a questionnaire-based, cross-sectional study. This is the second part of the study on sexual functions in females with DM where only females with DM (n=242) were analyzed. Sexual functions were compared between women with type 1 (n=109) and type 2 DM (N=133). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: To assess reported female sexual functions by using the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) in women with type 1 and type 2 DM. To establish the risk factors of female sexual dysfunction (FSD) in women with DM by using multivariate logistic regression model. RESULTS:Sexual dysfunction was diagnosed in 32.65% (n=64) of women with DM. Women with type 2 DM had a significantly lower number of points scored in all FSFI domains except pain compared to type 1 respondents. The only variables associated with DM significantly influencing sexual functioning were: type 2 diabetes in desire, arousal, as well as in global FSD (odds ratio [OR]=1.40; 2.70 and 3.31, respectively), the presence of retinopathy in lubrication (OR=7.8), and treatment with insulin in satisfaction domain (OR=0.29). Neither the presence of comorbidities, the duration of diabetes, the presence of diabetes complications nor the glycemic control was a moderator of FSD. The strongest significant predictors of FSD were: the presence of depressive symptoms, the importance of sex to the respondent, and satisfaction with the partner as a lover. CONCLUSIONS:Women with DM, especially type 2, are at risk of sexual dysfunctions. Diabetes-related factors have little impact on sexual functions in women with DM. Depressive symptoms, partner-related factors, and individual perception of sexuality should be evaluated when counseling females with DM.
Authors: Ayesha A Appa; Jennifer Creasman; Jeanette S Brown; Stephen K Van Den Eeden; David H Thom; Leslee L Subak; Alison J Huang Journal: J Sex Med Date: 2014-08-22 Impact factor: 3.802
Authors: Kelli L Copeland; Jeanette S Brown; Jennifer M Creasman; Stephen K Van Den Eeden; Leslee L Subak; David H Thom; Assiamira Ferrara; Alison J Huang Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2012-08 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Deepak Khandelwal; Lovely Gupta; Sanjay Kalra; Amit Vishwakarma; Priti Rishi Lal; Deep Dutta Journal: Indian J Community Med Date: 2018 Oct-Dec