Literature DB >> 21675964

Parameter recovery and model selection in mixed Rasch models.

David Preinerstorfer1, Anton K Formann.   

Abstract

This study examines the precision of conditional maximum likelihood estimates and the quality of model selection methods based on information criteria (AIC and BIC) in mixed Rasch models. The design of the Monte Carlo simulation study included four test lengths (10, 15, 25, 40), three sample sizes (500, 1000, 2500), two simulated mixture conditions (one and two groups), and population homogeneity (equally sized subgroups) or heterogeneity (one subgroup three times larger than the other). The results show that both increasing sample size and increasing number of items lead to higher accuracy; medium-range parameters were estimated more precisely than extreme ones; and the accuracy was higher in homogeneous populations. The minimum-BIC method leads to almost perfect results and is more reliable than AIC-based model selection. The results are compared to findings by Li, Cohen, Kim, and Cho (2009) and practical guidelines are provided. ©2011 The British Psychological Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21675964     DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8317.2011.02020.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Math Stat Psychol        ISSN: 0007-1102            Impact factor:   3.380


  9 in total

1.  Model Selection for Multilevel Mixture Rasch Models.

Authors:  Sedat Sen; Allan S Cohen; Seock-Ho Kim
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2018-06-07

2.  The Impact of Non-Normality on Extraction of Spurious Latent Classes in Mixture IRT Models.

Authors:  Sedat Sen; Allan S Cohen; Seock-Ho Kim
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2015-09-22

3.  Ignoring a Multilevel Structure in Mixture Item Response Models: Impact on Parameter Recovery and Model Selection.

Authors:  Woo-Yeol Lee; Sun-Joo Cho; Sonya K Sterba
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2017-06-19

4.  Comparison of Relative Fit Indices for Diagnostic Model Selection.

Authors:  Sedat Sen; Laine Bradshaw
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2017-03-08

5.  Rasch Mixture Models for DIF Detection: A Comparison of Old and New Score Specifications.

Authors:  Hannah Frick; Carolin Strobl; Achim Zeileis
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2014-06-22       Impact factor: 2.821

Review 6.  A review of empirical research related to the use of small quantitative samples in clinical outcome scale development.

Authors:  Carrie R Houts; Michael C Edwards; R J Wirth; Linda S Deal
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  The Jena Voice Learning and Memory Test (JVLMT): A standardized tool for assessing the ability to learn and recognize voices.

Authors:  Denise Humble; Stefan R Schweinberger; Axel Mayer; Tim L Jesgarzewsky; Christian Dobel; Romi Zäske
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2022-06-01

8.  Analyzing differential item functioning of the Nottingham Health Profile by Mixed Rasch Model.

Authors:  Selcen Yüksel; Atilla Halil Elhan; Derya Gökmen; Ayşe Adile Küçükdeveci; Şehim Kutlay
Journal:  Turk J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2018-04-02

9.  Sample Size Requirements for Applying Mixed Polytomous Item Response Models: Results of a Monte Carlo Simulation Study.

Authors:  Tanja Kutscher; Michael Eid; Claudia Crayen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-11-13
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.