Literature DB >> 21674699

Functional characterization of quiescent keratinocyte stem cells and their progeny reveals a hierarchical organization in human skin epidermis.

Holger Schlüter1, Sophie Paquet-Fifield, Pradnya Gangatirkar, Jason Li, Pritinder Kaur.   

Abstract

Although homeostatic renewal of human skin epidermis is achieved by the combined activity of quiescent stem cells (SCs) and their actively cycling progeny, whether these two populations are equipotent in their capacity to regenerate tissue has not been determined in biological assays that mimic lifelong renewal. Using fluorescence activated cell separation strategy validated previously by us, human epidermis was fractionated into three distinct subsets: that is, α 6briCD71(dim) , α 6briCD71(bri) , and α 6dim with characteristics of keratinocyte stem, transient amplifying, and early differentiating cells, respectively. The global gene expression profile of these fractions was determined by microarray, confirming that the α 6briCD71(dim) subset was quiescent, the α 6briCD71(bri) was actively cycling, and the α 6dim subset expressed markers of differentiation. More importantly, functional evaluation of these populations in an in vivo model for tissue reconstitution at limiting cell dilutions revealed that the quiescent α 6briCD71(dim) fraction was the most potent proliferative and tissue regenerative population of the epidermis, capable of long-term (LT) epidermal renewal from as little as 100 cells for up to 10 weeks. In contrast, the cycling α 6briCD71(bri) fraction was the first to initiate tissue reconstitution, although this was not sustained in the LT, while differentiating α 6dim cells possessed the lowest demonstrable tissue regenerative capacity. Our data suggest that in human skin, the epidermal proliferative compartment is not composed of equipotent cells, but rather is organized in a functionally hierarchical manner with the most potent quiescent SCs at its apex (i.e., α 6briCD71(dim) ) followed by cycling progenitors (i.e., α 6briCD71(bri) ) and finally early differentiating keratinocytes (i.e., α 6dim).
Copyright © 2011 AlphaMed Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21674699     DOI: 10.1002/stem.675

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stem Cells        ISSN: 1066-5099            Impact factor:   6.277


  21 in total

Review 1.  Regenerating the skin: a task for the heterogeneous stem cell pool and surrounding niche.

Authors:  Guiomar Solanas; Salvador Aznar Benitah
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 94.444

2.  Bioengineering a human plasma-based epidermal substitute with efficient grafting capacity and high content in clonogenic cells.

Authors:  Maia M Alexaline; Marina Trouillas; Muriel Nivet; Emilie Bourreau; Thomas Leclerc; Patrick Duhamel; Michele T Martin; Christelle Doucet; Nicolas O Fortunel; Jean-Jacques Lataillade
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 6.940

3.  Bimodal behaviour of interfollicular epidermal progenitors regulated by hair follicle position and cycling.

Authors:  Edwige Roy; Zoltan Neufeld; Luca Cerone; Ho Yi Wong; Samantha Hodgson; Jean Livet; Kiarash Khosrotehrani
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 11.598

4.  microRNA-103/107 Family Regulates Multiple Epithelial Stem Cell Characteristics.

Authors:  Han Peng; Jong Kook Park; Julia Katsnelson; Nihal Kaplan; Wending Yang; Spiro Getsios; Robert M Lavker
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 6.277

Review 5.  New insights into mechanisms of stem cell daughter fate determination in regenerative tissues.

Authors:  Aiko Sada; Tudorita Tumbar
Journal:  Int Rev Cell Mol Biol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 6.813

6.  Distinct expression patterns and roles of aldehyde dehydrogenases in normal oral mucosa keratinocytes: differential inhibitory effects of a pharmacological inhibitor and RNAi-mediated knockdown on cellular phenotype and epithelial morphology.

Authors:  Hiroko Kato; Kenji Izumi; Taro Saito; Hisashi Ohnuki; Michiko Terada; Yoshiro Kawano; Kayoko Nozawa-Inoue; Chikara Saito; Takeyasu Maeda
Journal:  Histochem Cell Biol       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 4.304

7.  Cell motion predicts human epidermal stemness.

Authors:  Daisuke Nanba; Fujio Toki; Sota Tate; Matome Imai; Natsuki Matsushita; Ken Shiraishi; Koji Sayama; Hiroshi Toki; Shigeki Higashiyama; Yann Barrandon
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2015-04-20       Impact factor: 10.539

Review 8.  Dermal Contributions to Human Interfollicular Epidermal Architecture and Self-Renewal.

Authors:  Kynan T Lawlor; Pritinder Kaur
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  Defining the cellular lineage hierarchy in the interfollicular epidermis of adult skin.

Authors:  Aiko Sada; Fadi Jacob; Eva Leung; Sherry Wang; Brian S White; David Shalloway; Tudorita Tumbar
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2016-05-16       Impact factor: 28.824

10.  Perlecan expression influences the keratin 15-positive cell population fate in the epidermis of aging skin.

Authors:  Morgan Dos Santos; Anna Michopoulou; Valérie André-Frei; Sophie Boulesteix; Christine Guicher; Guila Dayan; John Whitelock; Odile Damour; Patricia Rousselle
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 5.682

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.