Literature DB >> 21674594

Variability of urodynamic parameters in patients with overactive bladder.

Tara L Frenkl1, Radha Railkar, John Palcza, Boyd B Scott, Achilles Alon, Stuart Green, Werner Schaefer.   

Abstract

AIMS: To report interpatient, intrapatient, and study site variability of urodynamic study (UDS) parameters in patients with overactive bladder (OAB).
METHODS: Fifty-eight patients with OAB participated in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, urodynamic trial of an experimental OAB drug. Patients underwent 3 serial cystometries (CMGs) at three times: screening, pre-dose, and 4-hr postdose. This post hoc analysis describes intrapatient, interpatient, and site variability for the 6 CMGs prior to administration of study drug. Sites were given standard procedures for equipment calibration and UDS technique. Instilled volumes and pressures were recorded at first sensation of filling, first desire to void (FDV), strong desire to void (SDV), and maximum cystometric capacity (MCC).
RESULTS: The UDS volume endpoint with the smallest observed within-patient variability based on coefficient of variation (%CV) was MCC (%CV 24). Pressure measurements of all bladder sensations had larger within-patient variability than volume (MCC %CV 105). The between-patient variability was greater than within-patient variability for all bladder sensation volumes. Between-patient MCC variability for the 6 pre-treatment CMGs ranged from %CV of 50 to 58, whereas the within-patient %CV for MCC was 21-23. Excellent reproducibility was observed for bladder volume for MCC (intraclass correlation coefficients, range: 0.80-0.84). The between-site variability was large, as demonstrated by the mean volumes by site for MCC (132-397  ml).
CONCLUSIONS: MCC was the most reproducible sensation. Pressure measurements were substantially more variable than volume. Between-patient variability was substantially greater than within-patient variability. The observed intersite variability suggests that despite detailed instructions, sensations may not have been measured in a consistent manner across sites.
Copyright © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21674594     DOI: 10.1002/nau.21081

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn        ISSN: 0733-2467            Impact factor:   2.696


  3 in total

1.  Modeling the influence of acute changes in bladder elasticity on pressure and wall tension during filling.

Authors:  Firdaweke G Habteyes; S Omid Komari; Anna S Nagle; Adam P Klausner; Rebecca L Heise; Paul H Ratz; John E Speich
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2017-02-20

2.  Quantification of bladder wall biomechanics during urodynamics: A methodologic investigation using ultrasound.

Authors:  Anna S Nagle; Adam P Klausner; Jary Varghese; Rachel J Bernardo; Andrew F Colhoun; Robert W Barbee; Laura R Carucci; John E Speich
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2017-08-12       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Machine Learning for Urodynamic Detection of Detrusor Overactivity.

Authors:  Kevin T Hobbs; Nathaniel Choe; Leonid I Aksenov; Lourdes Reyes; Wilkins Aquino; Jonathan C Routh; James A Hokanson
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2021-10-29       Impact factor: 2.649

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.