Literature DB >> 21674572

Partial and total monosomal karyotypes in myelodysplastic syndromes: comparative prognostic relevance among 421 patients.

Carolina B Belli1, Raquel Bengió, Pedro Negri Aranguren, Francisco Sakamoto, María G Flores, Nora Watman, Elsa Nucifora, María V Prates, Jorge Arbelbide, Irene Larripa.   

Abstract

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) include a group of heterogeneous hematological disorders with a variable risk of leukemic evolution and short survival. Around 40-50% of patients show abnormal karyotypes that are mostly characterized by monosomies or deletions. Cytogenetic findings are an independent prognostic factor and the International prognostic scoring system (IPSS) differentiates three cytogenetic categories, despite the Intermediate one being heterogeneous. The aim of this study, including 421 Argentinean patients with primary MDS, is to characterize the cytogenetic profile, to test its prognostic value and to compare partial and monosomal karyotypes against other cytogenetic findings. An abnormal karyotype (median survival: 26 months) was observed in 176 patients. The presence of complex karyotypes, number of alterations, and the IPSS cytogenetic groups showed significant differences for predicting outcome. Behavior of patients with isolated deletions (median survival: 49 months) did not differ from those with normal karyotype (56 months, P = 0.654) or Good prognostic findings (43 months, P = 0.371). However, a worse prognosis was observed when another alteration was added (31 months, P = 0.043). Karyotypes with autosomal monosomies (median survival: 16 months) had a prognostic impact similar to other Poor cytogenetic findings (17 months, P = 0.626). In our population classified according to French-American-British (FAB) or World Health Organization (WHO), this new categorization of cytogenetic abnormalities, recognizing three different risk groups, showed an independent prognostic impact and a better discriminating power than the IPSS categories. It can be concluded that all isolate deletions (excluding 7q-) are good prognostic findings and all monosomies (excluding Y chromosome loss) are bad indicators.
Copyright © 2011 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21674572     DOI: 10.1002/ajh.22034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hematol        ISSN: 0361-8609            Impact factor:   10.047


  6 in total

1.  Cytogenetics, donor type, and use of hypomethylating agents in myelodysplastic syndrome with allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  Betul Oran; Piyanuch Kongtim; Uday Popat; Marcos de Lima; Elias Jabbour; Xinyan Lu; Julien Chen; Gabriella Rondon; Partow Kebriaei; Sairah Ahmed; Borje Andersson; Amin Alousi; Stefan Ciurea; Elizabeth Shpall; Richard E Champlin
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Specific abnormalities versus number of abnormalities and cytogenetic scoring systems for outcome prediction after allogeneic hematopoietic SCT for myelodysplastic syndromes.

Authors:  C Kelaidi; I Tzannou; I Baltadakis; I Batsis; D Mallouri; A Spyridonidis; S Gigantes; P Tsirigotis; I Apostolidis; A Athanasiadou; K Manola; A Anagnostopoulos; N Harhalakis; I Sakellari; D Karakasis
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 5.483

3.  Risks and benefits of sex-mismatched hematopoietic cell transplantation differ according to conditioning strategy.

Authors:  Hideki Nakasone; Mats Remberger; Lu Tian; Petter Brodin; Bita Sahaf; Fang Wu; Jonas Mattsson; Robert Lowsky; Robert Negrin; David B Miklos; Everett Meyer
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 4.  Transplantation for myelodysplastic syndromes 2013.

Authors:  Jennifer E Vaughn; Bart L Scott; H Joachim Deeg
Journal:  Curr Opin Hematol       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.284

5.  Monosomal and complex karyotypes as prognostic parameters in patients with International Prognostic Scoring System higher risk myelodysplastic syndrome treated with azacitidine.

Authors:  Kyung-Lim Hwang; Moo-Kon Song; Ho-Jin Shin; Hae-Jung Na; Dong-Hun Shin; Joong-Keun Kim; Joon-Ho Moon; Jae-Sook Ahn; Ik-Chan Song; Junshik Hong; Gyeong-Won Lee; Joo-Seop Chung
Journal:  Blood Res       Date:  2014-12-23

Review 6.  Monosomal karyotype in myeloid neoplasias: a literature review.

Authors:  Luisa Anelli; Crescenza Pasciolla; Antonella Zagaria; Giorgina Specchia; Francesco Albano
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 4.147

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.