Literature DB >> 21674260

Body-worn sensor design: what do patients and clinicians want?

J H M Bergmann1, A H McGregor.   

Abstract

User preferences need to be taken into account in order to be able to design devices that will gain acceptance both in a clinical and home setting. Sensor systems become redundant if patients or clinicians do not want to work with them. The aim of this systematic review was to determine both patients' and clinicians' preferences for non-invasive body-worn sensor systems. A search for relevant articles and conference proceedings was performed using MEDLINE, EMBASE, Current Contents Connect, and EEEI explore. In total 843 papers were identified of which only 11 studies were deemed suitable for inclusion. A range of different clinically relevant user groups were included. The key user preferences were that a body-worn sensor system should be compact, embedded and simple to operate and maintain. It also should not affect daily behavior nor seek to directly replace a health care professional. It became apparent that despite the importance of user preferences, they are rarely considered and as such there is a lack of high-quality studies in this area. We therefore would like to encourage researchers to focus on the implications of user preferences when designing wearable sensor systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21674260     DOI: 10.1007/s10439-011-0339-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0090-6964            Impact factor:   3.934


  51 in total

Review 1.  A Systematic Review of Wearable Patient Monitoring Systems - Current Challenges and Opportunities for Clinical Adoption.

Authors:  Mirza Mansoor Baig; Hamid GholamHosseini; Aasia A Moqeem; Farhaan Mirza; Maria Lindén
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 4.460

Review 2.  Assessing fall risk using wearable sensors: a practical discussion. A review of the practicalities and challenges associated with the use of wearable sensors for quantification of fall risk in older people.

Authors:  T Shany; S J Redmond; M Marschollek; N H Lovell
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.281

Review 3.  A comprehensive survey of wearable and wireless ECG monitoring systems for older adults.

Authors:  Mirza Mansoor Baig; Hamid Gholamhosseini; Martin J Connolly
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2013-01-19       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Experimental Verification of Micro-Doppler Radar Measurements of Fall-Risk-Related Gait Differences for Community-Dwelling Elderly Adults.

Authors:  Kenshi Saho; Masahiro Fujimoto; Yoshiyuki Kobayashi; Michito Matsumoto
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 3.576

5.  Physiotherapists' and Physiotherapy Students' Perspectives on the Use of Mobile or Wearable Technology in Their Practice.

Authors:  Jenna Blumenthal; Andrea Wilkinson; Mark Chignell
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 1.037

6.  Ambient and smartphone sensor assisted ADL recognition in multi-inhabitant smart environments.

Authors:  Nirmalya Roy; Archan Misra; Diane Cook
Journal:  J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput       Date:  2015-06-27

Review 7.  A Systematic Review of Wearable Sensors for Monitoring Physical Activity.

Authors:  Annica Kristoffersson; Maria Lindén
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 3.576

8.  Older Adults' Experiences With Using Wearable Devices: Qualitative Systematic Review and Meta-synthesis.

Authors:  Kevin Moore; Emma O'Shea; Lorna Kenny; John Barton; Salvatore Tedesco; Marco Sica; Colum Crowe; Antti Alamäki; Joan Condell; Anna Nordström; Suzanne Timmons
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 4.773

9.  Synergizing microfluidics with soft robotics: A perspective on miniaturization and future directions.

Authors:  Run Ze Gao; Carolyn L Ren
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 3.258

10.  Wearable and implantable sensors: the patient's perspective.

Authors:  Jeroen H M Bergmann; Vikesh Chandaria; Alison McGregor
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 3.576

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.