Literature DB >> 21673333

Tibial tuberosity advancement for treatment of CrCL injury: complications and owner satisfaction.

Ezra J Steinberg1, Raymond G Prata, Karen Palazzini, Dorothy C Brown.   

Abstract

The purpose of this retrospective study of 171 dogs that underwent 193 tibial tuberosity advancement (TTA) surgeries was to describe complications and owner satisfaction associated with the procedure. Complications occurred in 21 cases (11%). Subsequent meniscal tear was the most common complication (10/193, 5.2%). Increasing body weight (P=0.02-0.04) and small cage size (P=0.06) were significantly associated with postsurgical complications. Ninety-two percent of owners were satisfied with the outcome of the TTA procedure, but only 84% stated that they would be willing to have the procedure performed again. The authors concluded that TTA had a complication rate and owner satisfaction similar to other tibial osteotomies for the surgical correction of cranial cruciate ligament disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21673333     DOI: 10.5326/JAAHA-MS-5574

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Anim Hosp Assoc        ISSN: 0587-2871            Impact factor:   1.023


  13 in total

1.  Clinical assessment following tibial tuberosity advancement in 28 stifles at 6 months and 1 year after surgery.

Authors:  Tamara L MacDonald; David A Allen; Gabrielle J Monteith
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.008

2.  Major complications associated with fork-based and screw-based tibial tuberosity advancement implants: 438 cases.

Authors:  George A Edwards; Giselle Hosgood; Robert B Hancock; W Preston Stubbs; Andrew H Jackson
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 1.008

3.  The epidemiology of cruciate ligament rupture in an insured Swedish dog population.

Authors:  Karolina Engdahl; Ulf Emanuelson; Odd Höglund; Annika Bergström; Jeanette Hanson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Arthroscopic detection of medial meniscal injury with the use of a joint distractor in small-breed dogs.

Authors:  Joo-Ho Kim; Su-Young Heo; Hae-Beom Lee
Journal:  J Vet Sci       Date:  2017-12-31       Impact factor: 1.672

5.  Comparison of three imaging modalities used to evaluate bone healing after tibial tuberosity advancement in cranial cruciate ligament-deficient dogs and comparison of the effect of a gelatinous matrix and a demineralized bone matrix mix on bone healing - a pilot study.

Authors:  Marije Risselada; Matthew D Winter; Daniel D Lewis; Emily Griffith; Antonio Pozzi
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 2.741

6.  Comparison of tension band wiring and other tibial tuberosity advancement techniques for cranial cruciate ligament repair: an experimental study.

Authors:  William McCartney; Ciprian Ober; Maria Benito; Bryan MacDonald
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2019-10-02       Impact factor: 1.695

7.  Role of Tibial Tuberosity Fracture/Fissure through the Maquet Hole in Stifle Osteoarthritis after Porous Tibial Tuberosity Advancement in Dogs at Mid-Term Follow-Up.

Authors:  Alberto Maria Crovace; Francesco Staffieri; Donato Monopoli; Alejandro Artiles; Laura Fracassi; Antonio Crovace; Luca Lacitignola
Journal:  Vet Sci       Date:  2019-12-22

Review 8.  Tibial Plateau Leveling Osteotomy for Cranial Cruciate Ligament Rupture in Canines: Patient Selection and Reported Outcomes.

Authors:  Andy Nanda; Eric C Hans
Journal:  Vet Med (Auckl)       Date:  2019-12-27

9.  In vivo fluoroscopic kinematography of cranio-caudal stifle stability after tibial tuberosity advancement (TTA): a retrospective case series of 10 stifles.

Authors:  Maartje Schwede; Janna Rey; Peter Böttcher
Journal:  Open Vet J       Date:  2018-08-08

10.  A novel tibial tuberosity advancement technique with cranial implant fixation (TTA CF): a pilot study in sheep.

Authors:  Yauheni Zhalniarovich; Marta Mieszkowska; Paulina Przyborowska-Zhalniarovich; Joanna Głodek; Andrzej Sobolewski; Grzegorz Waluś; Zbigniew Adamiak
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 2.741

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.