Literature DB >> 21673067

FDG-PET as a potential tool for selecting patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer who may be spared maintenance therapy after first-line chemotherapy.

Dok Hyun Yoon1, Sora Baek, Chang-Min Choi, Dae Ho Lee, Cheolwon Suh, Jin-Sook Ryu, Dae Hyuk Moon, Jung Shin Lee, Sang-We Kim.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate whether 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) may be a potential tool to select a subgroup of patients who might be spared maintenance treatment, if the metabolic response after first-line chemotherapy could predict time-to-progression (TTP). EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: A total of 43 patients who underwent baseline FDG-PET scan and did not show disease progression (DP) after 4 cycles of first-line chemotherapy were enrolled and underwent second FDG-PET 3 weeks after completion of the first-line chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was to compare percent decrease in maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax) between early (TTP after second PET examination <8 weeks) and late (TTP ≥8 weeks) DP subgroups. Secondary endpoints were to determine whether fractional decrease in SUVmax could predict TTP and overall survival (OS), both calculated from the date of the second FDG-PET.
RESULTS: Percent decreases in SUVmax in late DP subgroup were greater than those in early DP subgroup (mean reduction, 54.7% ± 27.2% vs. 27.8% ± 46.8%, P = 0.021). Receiver operating characteristic curves identified a 50.0% decrease in SUVmax as the optimal threshold to distinguish these subgroups. Using this value as the cutoff resulted in a positive predictive value of 82.6% and negative predictive value of 60.0% in predicting TTP ≥8 weeks. Patients with SUVmax decrease <50% had significantly longer median TTP (3.0 vs. 1.5 months, P = 0.001) and OS (not reached vs. 14.2 months, P = 0.003).
CONCLUSIONS: Fractional decrease in SUVmax of the main lesion after completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy may discriminate patients with TTP ≥8 weeks and predict TTP and OS in patients with advanced NSCLC. ©2011 AACR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21673067     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-2791

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  4 in total

Review 1.  Recent Trends in PET Image Interpretations Using Volumetric and Texture-based Quantification Methods in Nuclear Oncology.

Authors:  Muhammad Kashif Rahim; Sung Eun Kim; Hyeongryul So; Hyung Jun Kim; Gi Jeong Cheon; Eun Seong Lee; Keon Wook Kang; Dong Soo Lee
Journal:  Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-01-22

Review 2.  PET in the management of locally advanced and metastatic NSCLC.

Authors:  Willem Grootjans; Lioe-Fee de Geus-Oei; Esther G C Troost; Eric P Visser; Wim J G Oyen; Johan Bussink
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 66.675

3.  Metabolic response evaluated by 18F-FDG PET/CT as a potential screening tool in identifying a subgroup of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer for immediate maintenance therapy after first-line chemotherapy.

Authors:  Seung Hwan Moon; Su-Hee Cho; Lee Chun Park; Jun Ho Ji; Jong-Mu Sun; Jin Sock Ahn; Keunchil Park; Joon Young Choi; Myung-Ju Ahn
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Metabolic response assessment with 18F-FDG PET/CT: inter-method comparison and prognostic significance for patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Jingbo Wang; Ka Kit Wong; Morand Piert; Paul Stanton; Kirk A Frey; Feng-Ming Spring Kong
Journal:  J Radiat Oncol       Date:  2015-03-12
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.