Literature DB >> 21672819

Neuromechanics: an integrative approach for understanding motor control.

Kiisa Nishikawa1, Andrew A Biewener, Peter Aerts, Anna N Ahn, Hillel J Chiel, Monica A Daley, Thomas L Daniel, Robert J Full, Melina E Hale, Tyson L Hedrick, A Kristopher Lappin, T Richard Nichols, Roger D Quinn, Richard A Satterlie, Brett Szymik.   

Abstract

Neuromechanics seeks to understand how muscles, sense organs, motor pattern generators, and brain interact to produce coordinated movement, not only in complex terrain but also when confronted with unexpected perturbations. Applications of neuromechanics include ameliorating human health problems (including prosthesis design and restoration of movement following brain or spinal cord injury), as well as the design, actuation and control of mobile robots. In animals, coordinated movement emerges from the interplay among descending output from the central nervous system, sensory input from body and environment, muscle dynamics, and the emergent dynamics of the whole animal. The inevitable coupling between neural information processing and the emergent mechanical behavior of animals is a central theme of neuromechanics. Fundamentally, motor control involves a series of transformations of information, from brain and spinal cord to muscles to body, and back to brain. The control problem revolves around the specific transfer functions that describe each transformation. The transfer functions depend on the rules of organization and operation that determine the dynamic behavior of each subsystem (i.e., central processing, force generation, emergent dynamics, and sensory processing). In this review, we (1) consider the contributions of muscles, (2) sensory processing, and (3) central networks to motor control, (4) provide examples to illustrate the interplay among brain, muscles, sense organs and the environment in the control of movement, and (5) describe advances in both robotics and neuromechanics that have emerged from application of biological principles in robotic design. Taken together, these studies demonstrate that (1) intrinsic properties of muscle contribute to dynamic stability and control of movement, particularly immediately after perturbations; (2) proprioceptive feedback reinforces these intrinsic self-stabilizing properties of muscle; (3) control systems must contend with inevitable time delays that can simplify or complicate control; and (4) like most animals under a variety of circumstances, some robots use a trial and error process to tune central feedforward control to emergent body dynamics.

Entities:  

Year:  2007        PMID: 21672819     DOI: 10.1093/icb/icm024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Integr Comp Biol        ISSN: 1540-7063            Impact factor:   3.326


  64 in total

1.  Passive motion paradigm: an alternative to optimal control.

Authors:  Vishwanathan Mohan; Pietro Morasso
Journal:  Front Neurorobot       Date:  2011-12-27       Impact factor: 2.650

2.  Automatic reconstruction of physiological gestures used in a model of birdsong production.

Authors:  Santiago Boari; Yonatan Sanz Perl; Ana Amador; Daniel Margoliash; Gabriel B Mindlin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 3.  Neuromechanics of muscle synergies for posture and movement.

Authors:  Lena H Ting; J Lucas McKay
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 6.627

4.  The role of intrinsic muscle mechanics in the neuromuscular control of stable running in the guinea fowl.

Authors:  Monica A Daley; Alexandra Voloshina; Andrew A Biewener
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Emergence of the advancing neuromechanical phase in a resistive force dominated medium.

Authors:  Yang Ding; Sarah S Sharpe; Kurt Wiesenfeld; Daniel I Goldman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-06-03       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Climbing, falling, and jamming during ant locomotion in confined environments.

Authors:  Nick Gravish; Daria Monaenkova; Michael A D Goodisman; Daniel I Goldman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-05-20       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Different Segments within Vertebrate Muscles Can Operate on Different Regions of Their Force-Length Relationships.

Authors:  A N Ahn; N Konow; C Tijs; A A Biewener
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 3.326

Review 8.  Functional and architectural complexity within and between muscles: regional variation and intermuscular force transmission.

Authors:  Timothy E Higham; Andrew A Biewener
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Leg muscles that mediate stability: mechanics and control of two distal extensor muscles during obstacle negotiation in the guinea fowl.

Authors:  Monica A Daley; Andrew A Biewener
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  Estimation of musculoskeletal models from in situ measurements of muscle action in the rat hindlimb.

Authors:  Sang Hoon Yeo; Christopher H Mullens; Thomas G Sandercock; Dinesh K Pai; Matthew C Tresch
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 3.312

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.