Literature DB >> 21672502

Response rates to fluoxetine in subjects who initially show no improvement.

Michael A Posternak1, Lee Baer, Andrew A Nierenberg, Maurizio Fava.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study sought to investigate the likelihood that subjects will respond to continued antidepressant therapy when little or no benefit has yet been observed.
METHOD: Six hundred twenty-seven subjects diagnosed with DSM-IV major depressive disorder were recruited in a 12-week open-label trial with fluoxetine, which was designed as a preliminary phase to a subsequent 52-week continuation trial, which was conducted in 1997-2003. For each week of the study, a calculation was made for all subjects who had heretofore demonstrated little or no improvement as to the likelihood of converting to a positive response in subsequent weeks as measured by the Clinical Global Impressions scale, the primary outcome measure. In order to compare our findings with prior research, we focused primarily on outcomes at weeks 6, 8, and 12.
RESULTS: The likelihood of converting to a positive response decreased the longer subjects remained unimproved. When week 6 was used as the end point, the likelihood of converting to a positive response for unimproved subjects at week 1 was 36% (n = 302); the respective conversion rates for weeks 2-5 were 29% (n = 208) at week 2, 18% (n = 151) at week 3, 17% (n = 120) at week 4, and 9% (n = 91) at week 5. When week 8 was used as the end point, the likelihood of converting to a positive response for unimproved subjects at week 4 was 23% (n = 118) and, at week 6, was 10% (n = 61). Finally, when week 12 was used as the end point, the likelihood of unimproved subjects at weeks 4, 6, and 8 converting to a positive response at week 12 was 50% (n = 117), 33% (n = 60), and 30% (n = 46), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The study adds to a small, but growing literature that gives clinicians some guidelines to help decide whether to continue an antidepressant trial when little or no benefit has yet been observed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00427128. © Copyright 2011 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21672502     DOI: 10.4088/JCP.10m06098

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry        ISSN: 0160-6689            Impact factor:   4.384


  5 in total

1.  Exploring Antidepressant Adherence at a Student-Run Free Mental Health Clinic.

Authors:  Claire L Mann; Robert A Rifkin; Elisa M Nabel; David C Thomas; Yasmin S Meah; Craig L Katz
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  2018-07-30

2.  Dose increase of S-Adenosyl-Methionine and escitalopram in a randomized clinical trial for major depressive disorder.

Authors:  Hitoshi Sakurai; Linda L Carpenter; Audrey R Tyrka; Lawrence H Price; George I Papakostas; Christina M Dording; Albert S Yeung; Cristina Cusin; Elizabeth Ludington; Richard Bernard-Negron; Maurizio Fava; David Mischoulon
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 4.839

Review 3.  A systematic approach to pharmacotherapy for geriatric major depression.

Authors:  Benoit H Mulsant; Daniel M Blumberger; Zahinoor Ismail; Kiran Rabheru; Mark J Rapoport
Journal:  Clin Geriatr Med       Date:  2014-06-14       Impact factor: 3.076

Review 4.  Early switching strategies in antidepressant non-responders: current evidence and future research directions.

Authors:  Paul A Kudlow; Roger S McIntyre; Raymond W Lam
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 5.749

Review 5.  Examining the Use of Antidepressants for Adolescents with Depression/Anxiety Who Regularly Use Cannabis: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Danielle Hen-Shoval; Aron Weller; Abraham Weizman; Gal Shoval
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.