Literature DB >> 21672441

In vitro and in vivo chitosan membranes testing for peripheral nerve reconstruction.

M J Simões1, A Gärtner, Y Shirosaki, R M Gil da Costa, P P Cortez, F Gartnër, J D Santos, M A Lopes, S Geuna, A S P Varejão, A Colette Maurício.   

Abstract

Tissue regeneration over a large defect with a subsequent satisfactory functional recovery still stands as a major problem in areas such as nerve regeneration or bone healing. The routine technique for the reconstruction of a nerve gap is the use of autologous nerve grafting, but still with severe complications. Over the last decades several attempts have been made to overcome this problem by using biomaterials as scaffolds for guided tissue regeneration. Despite the wide range of biomaterials available, functional recovery after a serious nerve injury is still far from acceptable. Prior to the use of a new biomaterial on healing tissues, an evaluation of the host's inflammatory response is mandatory. In this study, three chitosan membranes were tested in vitro and in vivo for later use as nerve guides for the reconstruction of peripheral nerves submitted to axonotmesis or neurotmesis lesions. Chitosan membranes, with different compositions, were tested in vitro, with a nerve growth factor cellular producing system, N1E-115 cell line, cultured over each of the three membranes and differentiated for 48h in the presence of 1.5% of DMSO. The intracellular calcium concentrations of the non-differentiated and of the 48h-differentiated cells cultured on the three types of the chitosan membranes were measured to determine the cell culture viability. In vivo, the chitosan membranes were implanted subcutaneously in a rat model, and histological evaluations were performed from material retrieved on weeks 1, 2, 4 and 8 after implantation. The three types of chitosan membranes were a viable substrate for the N1E-115 cell multiplication, survival and differentiation. Furthermore, the in vivo studies suggested that these chitosan membranes are promising candidates as a supporting material for tissue engineering applications on the peripheral nerve, possibly owing to their porous structure, their chemical modifications and high affinity to cellular systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21672441

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Med Port        ISSN: 0870-399X


  11 in total

1.  A Bilayer Engineered Skin Substitute for Wound Repair in an Irradiation-Impeded Healing Model on Rat.

Authors:  A B Mohd Hilmi; Asma Hassan; Ahmad Sukari Halim
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 4.730

2.  Local Administration of Methylprednisolone Laden Hydrogel Enhances Functional Recovery of Transected Sciatic Nerve in Rat.

Authors:  Ali Mehrshad; Mohammad Shahraki; Shahin Ehteshamfar
Journal:  Bull Emerg Trauma       Date:  2017-10

3.  Chitosan Functionalized Magnetic Nanoparticles to Provide Neural Regeneration and Recovery after Experimental Model Induced Peripheral Nerve Injury.

Authors:  Nadina Liana Pop; Alexandrina Nan; Andrada Elena Urda-Cimpean; Adrian Florea; Vlad Alexandru Toma; Remus Moldovan; Nicoleta Decea; Daniela Rodica Mitrea; Remus Orasan
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2021-04-30

Review 4.  Modification of tubular chitosan-based peripheral nerve implants: applications for simple or more complex approaches.

Authors:  Nina Dietzmeyer; Maria Förthmann; Claudia Grothe; Kirsten Haastert-Talini
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 5.135

Review 5.  Challenges for nerve repair using chitosan-siloxane hybrid porous scaffolds.

Authors:  Yuki Shirosaki; Satoshi Hayakawa; Akiyoshi Osaka; Maria A Lopes; José D Santos; Stefano Geuna; Ana C Mauricio
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Chitosan nerve tube for primary repair of traumatic sensory nerve lesions of the hand without a gap: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Florian Neubrech; Sina Heider; Leila Harhaus; Berthold Bickert; Ulrich Kneser; Thomas Kremer
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2016-01-26       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 7.  Chitosan and Its Potential Use as a Scaffold for Tissue Engineering in Regenerative Medicine.

Authors:  Martin Rodríguez-Vázquez; Brenda Vega-Ruiz; Rodrigo Ramos-Zúñiga; Daniel Alexander Saldaña-Koppel; Luis Fernando Quiñones-Olvera
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-10-04       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 8.  Versatility of Chitosan-Based Biomaterials and Their Use as Scaffolds for Tissue Regeneration.

Authors:  José Carlos Viana Ribeiro; Rodrigo Silveira Vieira; Iracema Matos Melo; Vilana Maria Adriano Araújo; Vilma Lima
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2017-04-16

9.  Nerve guidance conduit design based on self-rolling tubes.

Authors:  T B Aigner; C Haynl; S Salehi; A O'Connor; T Scheibel
Journal:  Mater Today Bio       Date:  2020-01-27

10.  Bilaminar Chitosan Scaffold for Sellar Floor Repair in Transsphenoidal Surgery.

Authors:  Rodrigo Ramos-Zúñiga; Francisco López-González; Ivan Segura-Durán
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2020-02-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.