| Literature DB >> 21672247 |
Jing Ke1, Dhrubojyoti D Laskar, Deepak Singh, Shulin Chen.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Termites are highly effective at degrading lignocelluloses, and thus can be used as a model for studying plant cell-wall degradation in biological systems. However, the process of lignin deconstruction and/or degradation in termites is still not well understood.Entities:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21672247 PMCID: PMC3130652 DOI: 10.1186/1754-6834-4-17
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biotechnol Biofuels ISSN: 1754-6834 Impact factor: 6.040
Figure 1Spectroscopy. 13C 13C crosspolarization magic angle spinning and nuclear magnetic resonance (CP-MAS-NMR) analysis of the undigested control (red) and termite-digested softwood (black) samples. The inset represents the enlarged portion of the aromatic resonances.
Figure 2Pyrogram of (A) . Numbers areas in Table 1. IS = internal standard. The peaks labeled from 41I to 43I are novel compounds that appeared in the fecal sample after digestion by termites. The new peaks and the IS are labeled by arrows and numbers; all the other phenolics and levoglucosan are labeled by arrows only. The structures of the labeled compounds are shown in Figure 3.
Pyrolysis products of each sample
| Number | RTb, minutes | Compound identificationc | Content of compound, mg/g | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Undigested wood | Feces | Change, % | |||
| 1.811 | 1-Propen-2-ol, acetate | 10.75 ± 0.51 | 4.74 ± 0.23 | -55.9 ± 2.7 | |
| 5.319 | Furfural | 5.47 ± 0.26 | 2.27 ± 0.11 | -58.6 ± 2.8 | |
| 5.866 | 2-Furanmethanol | 2.01 ± 0.09 | 1.02 ± 0.04 | -49.2 ± 2.1 | |
| 6.547 | 2-Cyclopentene-1,4-dione | 1.70 ± 0.08 | 0.60 ± 0.03 | -64.5 ± 3.1 | |
| 7.274 | 2(5H)-Furanone | 2.62 ± 0.12 | 1.34 ± 0.06 | -48.7 ± 2.2 | |
| 7.533 | 1,2-Cyclopentanedione | 6.58 ± 0.32 | 2.81 ± 0.13 | -57.3 ± 2.8 | |
| 7.926 | Dihydro-3-methylene-2,5-furandione | 1.17 ± 0.04 | 0.43 ± 0.02 | -62.6 ± 2.4 | |
| 8.409 | 3-Butyldihydro-2(3H)-furanone | 2.97 ± 0.10 | 1.21 ± 0.04 | -59.2 ± 2.0 | |
| 8.780 | Resorcinol | 1.33 ± 0.06 | 0.58 ± 0.03 | -56.2 ± 2.7 | |
| 8.940 | Phenol | 1.04 ± 0.05 | 1.47 ± 0.07 | +42.6 ± 2.0 | |
| 10.109 | 3-Methyl-1,2-cyclopentanedione | 2.67 ± 0.11 | 1.16 ± 0.05 | -56.6 ± 2.3 | |
| 10.553 | 4-Methyl-5H-furan-2-one | 2.07 ± 0.09 | N/A | - | |
| 10.739/11.263 | 3-Methylphenol | 9.98 ± 0.47 | 3.99 ± 0.19 | -60.0 ± 2.9 | |
| 11.567 | 2-Methoxyphenol | 8.65 ± 0.41 | 8.64 ± 0.41 | -0.1 ± 0.0 | |
| 12.283 | Maltol | 1.36 ± 0.06 | N/A | - | |
| 13.038 | 2,5-Dimethylphenol | 1.38 ± 0.06 | 1.33 ± 0.06 | -3.7 ± 0.2 | |
| 13.314 | 5-heptyldihydro-2(3H)-Furanone | 1.79 ± 0.08 | N/A | - | |
| 13.469 | 2,3-Dihydroxybenzaldehyde | 1.22 ± 0.05 | N/A | - | |
| 13.724/14.125 | 2-Methoxy-4-methylphenol | 12.27 ± 0.42 | 12.51 ± 0.48 | +2.0 ± 0.1 | |
| 14.280 | 4-Methoxy-2,5-dimethyl-3(2H)-furanone | 7.33 ± 0.25 | N/A | - | |
| 14.569 | 1,2-Benzenediol | 7.45 ± 0.35 | 4.08 ± 0.19 | -45.2 ± 2.1 | |
| 15.027, 19.643, 20.902, 17.140-17.257, 21.101, 21.817, 22.102-22.500 | 34.14 ± 1.65 | 13.79 ± 0.67 | -59.6 ± 2.9 | ||
| 15.415 | 5-(Hydroxymethyl)-2-furancarboxaldehyde | 8.80 ± 0.33 | N/A | - | |
| 15.898 | 3-Methyl-1,2-benzenediol | 2.33 ± 0.08 | 1.974 ± 0.06 | -15.2 ± 0.5 | |
| 16.101 | 4-Ethyl-2-methoxyphenol, | 3.28 ± 0.16 | 3.194 ± 0.15 | -2.7 ± 0.1 | |
| 16.601 | 4-Methyl-1,2-benzenediol | 8.33 ± 0.39 | 3.337 ± 0.16 | -59.9 ± 2.8 | |
| 16.955 | 2-Methoxy-4-vinylphenol | 11.29 ± 0.46 | 14.246 ± 0.57 | +26.2 ± 1.0 | |
| 17.563 | 4-(2-Propenyl)phenol | 0.97 ± 0.05 | 1.383 ± 0.06 | +42.4 ± 2.0 | |
| 17.887 | Eugenol | 4.85 ± 0.23 | 5.336 ± 0.25 | +10.0 ± 0.5 | |
| 18.072, 20.156 | 2-Methoxy-4-propylphenol | 5.20 ± 0.25 | 3.878 ± 0.18 | -25.5 ± 1.2 | |
| 18.935 | Vanillin | 7.67 ± 0.33 | 10.594 ± 0.46 | +38.2 ± 1.7 | |
| 19.901 | Isoeugenol | 12.03 ± 0.44 | 14.113 ± 0.05 | +17.3 ± 0.8 | |
| 20.730 | 1-(4-Hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)-ethanone | 8.38 ± 0.32 | 6.966 ± 0.62 | -16.8 ± 0.8 | |
| 21.618 | 1-(4-Hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)-2-propanone | 1.95 ± 0.04 | 5.984 ± 0.26 | +207.1 ± 0.4 | |
| 22.447/24.315/25.574 | 4-((1E)-3-Hydroxy-1-propenyl)-2-methoxyphenol | 8.13 ± 0.31 | 11.385 ± 0.33 | +39.9 ± 0.8 | |
| 22.563 | 4-Hydroxy-3-methoxy-benzoic acid | 2.72 ± 0.09 | 2.498 ± 0.29 | -8.2 ± 0.3 | |
| 23.905 | 4-Hydroxy-3-methoxy-benzeneacetic acid | 7.43 ± 0.31 | 7.508 ± 0.44 | +1.0 ± 0.0 | |
| 25.458 | 4-Hydroxy-2-methoxycinnamaldehyde | 1.75 ± 0.08 | 7.515 ± 0.28 | +328.9 ± 2.3 | |
| 34.297 | 10,11-Dihydro-10-hydroxy-2,3-dimethoxydibenz | 0.58 ± 0.02 | 0.706 ± 0.30 | +22.2 ± 1.0 | |
| 34.703 | Dihydrofisetin | 0.81 ± 0.04 | 0.611 ± 0.29 | -24.6 ± 0.0 | |
| 14.768 | 2,3-Dihydro-benzofuran | N/A | 1.150 ± 0.03 | - | |
| 21.265 | Benzoic acid, 4-hydroxy-3-methoxy- methyl ester | N/A | 1.946 ± 0.09 | - | |
| 22.671 | 2,4'-Dihydroxy-3'-methoxyacetophenone | N/A | 1.330 ± 0.04 | - | |
aIdentified products from thermal degradation of lignin and their absolute amounts (g/g, mean of three replicate analyses) calculated using the correction factor value.
bRetention time.
cSee the structures of the labeled compounds in Figure 5.
Figure 3Compound structures. Assignment of all the structures of compounds labeled in Figure 2.
Figure 4Pyrogram. Flash pyrolysis with gas chromatography mass spectrometry in the presence of tetramethylammonium hydroxide(Py-TMAH)-GC/MS profiles of (A) undigested softwood and (B) termite feces. (The peaks labeled as 1N to 25N in the fecal spectrum are novel pyrolyzed compounds that appeared after digestion by termites. All the peaks indicated in the undigested control spectrum are pyrolyzed compounds that were not present in the fecal sample. he structures of the labeled compounds are shown in Figure 5.
Figure 5Compound structures. Assignment of all the structures of compounds labeled in Figure 4 and Table 1.