Literature DB >> 21672114

Clinical outcomes in residential care: setting benchmarks for quality.

Maria O'Reilly1, Mary Courtney, Helen Edwards, Stacey Hassall.   

Abstract

AIM: Australian residential aged care does not have a system of quality assessment related to clinical outcomes, or comprehensive quality benchmarking. The Residential Care Quality Assessment was developed to fill this gap; and this paper discusses the process by which preliminary benchmarks representing high and low quality were developed for it.
METHODS: Data were collected from all residents (n = 498) of nine facilities. Numerator-denominator analysis of clinical outcomes occurred at a facility-level, with rank-ordered results circulated to an expert panel. The panel identified threshold scores to indicate excellent and questionable care quality, and refined these through Delphi process.
RESULTS: Clinical outcomes varied both within and between facilities; agreed thresholds for excellent and poor outcomes were finalised after three Delphi rounds.
CONCLUSION: Use of the Residential Care Quality Assessment provides a concrete means of monitoring care quality and allows benchmarking across facilities; its regular use could contribute to improved care outcomes within residential aged care in Australia.
© 2010 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2010 ACOTA.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21672114     DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-6612.2010.00447.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Australas J Ageing        ISSN: 1440-6381            Impact factor:   2.111


  3 in total

1.  Seating in aged care: Physical fit, independence and comfort.

Authors:  Alethea Blackler; Claire Brophy; Maria O'Reilly; Marianella Chamorro-Koc
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2018-01-04

2.  CareTrack Aged: the appropriateness of care delivered to Australians living in residential aged care facilities: a study protocol.

Authors:  Peter D Hibbert; Louise K Wiles; Ian D Cameron; Alison Kitson; Richard L Reed; Andrew Georgiou; Len Gray; Johanna Westbrook; Hanna Augustsson; Charlotte J Molloy; Gaston Arnolda; Hsuen P Ting; Rebecca Mitchell; Frances Rapport; Susan J Gordon; William B Runciman; Jeffrey Braithwaite
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-06-25       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Assessing sarcopenic prevalence and risk factors in residential aged care: methodology and feasibility.

Authors:  Timothy R Henwood; Justin W Keogh; Natasha Reid; Will Jordan; Hugh E Senior
Journal:  J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 12.910

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.