Literature DB >> 21671741

What does ipsilateral delay activity reflect? Inferences from slow potentials in a lateralized visual working memory task.

Anna M Arend1, Hubert D Zimmer.   

Abstract

In the lateralized change detection task, two item arrays are presented, one on each side of the display. Participants have to remember the items in the relevant hemifield and ignore the items in the irrelevant hemifield. A difference wave between contralateral and ipsilateral slow potentials with respect to the relevant items, the contralateral delay activity, can be calculated. As its amplitude varies with the number of items held in working memory (WM) and reaches its asymptote with WM capacity, it is considered a pure neural correlate of visual WM load. However, in addition to this contralateral delay activity, load-dependent activity has also been observed over the hemisphere ipsilateral to the relevant hemifield, suggesting that the ipsilateral hemisphere is also involved in memory-related processes. This ipsilateral activity might either reflect a bilateral processing of relevant or else a lateralized processing of irrelevant, to-be-filtered-out items. As in the lateralized change detection task, the number of items on both sides of the display is typically identical, it was not possible to decide between these alternatives yet. To disentangle the influence of relevant and irrelevant items, we orthogonally varied the number of both types of items. Processing of relevant items caused purely contralateral load-dependent activity. Ipsilateral slow potentials were influenced by the number of irrelevant items only if visual WM load was low, but not if it was high. This suggests that whether irrelevant items are processed or filtered out depends on visual WM load.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21671741     DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00068

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  8 in total

1.  Does high memory load kick task-irrelevant information out of visual working memory?

Authors:  Jun Yin; Jifan Zhou; Haokui Xu; Junying Liang; Zaifeng Gao; Mowei Shen
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-04

Review 2.  The contralateral delay activity as a neural measure of visual working memory.

Authors:  Roy Luria; Halely Balaban; Edward Awh; Edward K Vogel
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 8.989

3.  The effects of self-focus on attentional biases in social anxiety:An ERP study.

Authors:  Matt R Judah; DeMond M Grant; Nancy B Carlisle
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  No behavioral or ERP evidence for a developmental lag in visual working memory capacity or filtering in adolescents and adults with ADHD.

Authors:  Marjolein Spronk; Edward K Vogel; Lisa M Jonkman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Working memory in ALS patients: preserved performance but marked changes in underlying neuronal networks.

Authors:  Tino Zaehle; Andreas Becke; Nicole Naue; Judith Machts; Susanne Abdulla; Susanne Petri; Katja Kollewe; Reinhard Dengler; Hans-Jochen Heinze; Stefan Vielhaber; Notger G Müller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-08       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Social exclusion weakens storage capacity and attentional filtering ability in visual working memory.

Authors:  Mengsi Xu; Lei Qiao; Senqing Qi; Zhiai Li; Liuting Diao; Lingxia Fan; Lijie Zhang; Dong Yang
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 3.436

7.  EEG dynamics reveal a dissociation between storage and selective attention within working memory.

Authors:  Eren Günseli; Johannes Jacobus Fahrenfort; Dirk van Moorselaar; Konstantinos Christos Daoultzis; Martijn Meeter; Christian N L Olivers
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Does numerical similarity alter age-related distractibility in working memory?

Authors:  Chiara Francesca Tagliabue; Debora Brignani; Veronica Mazza
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.