Literature DB >> 21671740

Study-test congruency affects encoding-related brain activity for some but not all stimulus materials.

Eva M Bauch1, Leun J Otten.   

Abstract

Memory improves when encoding and retrieval processes overlap. Here, we investigated how the neural bases of long-term memory encoding vary as a function of the degree to which functional processes engaged at study are engaged again at test. In an incidental learning paradigm, electrical brain activity was recorded from the scalps of healthy adults while they made size judgments on intermixed series of pictures and words. After a 1-hr delay, memory for the items was tested with a recognition task incorporating remember/know judgments. In different groups of participants, studied items were either probed in the same mode of presentation (word-word; picture-picture) or in the alternative mode of presentation (word-picture; picture-word). Activity over anterior scalp sites predicted later memory of words, irrespective of type of test probe. Encoding-related activity for pictures, by contrast, differed qualitatively depending on how an item was cued at test. When a picture was probed with a picture, activity over anterior scalp sites predicted encoding success. When a picture was probed with a word, encoding-related activity was instead maximal over posterior sites. Activity differed according to study-test congruency from around 100 msec after picture onset. These findings indicate that electrophysiological correlates of encoding are sensitive to the similarity between processes engaged at study and test. The time course supports a direct and not merely consequential role of encoding-retrieval overlap in encoding. However, because congruency only affected one type of stimulus material, encoding-retrieval overlap may not be a universal organizing principle of neural correlates of memory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21671740     DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00070

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  4 in total

Review 1.  Does Semantic Congruency Accelerate Episodic Encoding, or Increase Semantic Elaboration?

Authors:  Roni Tibon; Elisa Cooper; Andrea Greve
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Improving Student Understanding of Academic Assessment Vocabulary Words Using Visual Cues: A Collaborative Effort.

Authors:  Kim Soper; Jenenne A Geske; Liliana Bronner; Maurice Godfrey
Journal:  J Community Engagem Scholarsh       Date:  2022-07-29

3.  ERP Subsequent Memory Effects Differ between Inter-Item and Unitization Encoding Tasks.

Authors:  Siri-Maria Kamp; Regine Bader; Axel Mecklinger
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Neural Pattern Classification Tracks Transfer-Appropriate Processing in Episodic Memory.

Authors:  Inês Bramão; Mikael Johansson
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2018-08-23
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.