Literature DB >> 21671692

Assessment of parents' preferences for the treatment of school-age children with ADHD: a discrete choice experiment.

Jörg M Fegert1, Lara Slawik, Detlef Wermelskirchen, Matthias Nübling, Axel Mühlbacher.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Treatment decisions for children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) should include parents' preferences, since parents' acceptance and support are crucial for ensuring treatment adherence and, as a consequence, good clinical outcomes. Discrete choice experiments (DCEs, also known as conjoint experiences) are an important technique for identification and assessment of preferences for different treatment characteristics. In this study, a DCE was performed to analyze and to discuss parents' preferences regarding ADHD treatment for their school-aged children.
METHODS: This article presents a mixed-method approach; qualitative and quantitative methods were used to ascertain the attributes that might influence a parent's choices for the optimal management of their child with ADHD. Parents of patients with ADHD in Germany completed a self-administered survey. Relevant characteristics of an ideal ADHD treatment were collected by reviewing the literature and by conducting a qualitative study with focus groups. The study involved a subgroup of parents of school-age children aged 6-14 years (n = 121). Attitudes were measured and analyzed using a classic rating scale (5-point Likert format). Preferences were elicited using a DCE; scenarios were analyzed using a random-effects logit model.
RESULTS: A total of 121 questionnaires were completed by caregivers (101 mothers, 16 fathers and four others) on behalf of their school-age children (6-14 years, 87% male). Six main attributes were investigated regarding their impact on parent preferences for ADHD treatment. While all were statistically significant in the DCE, improvements in the child's social situation (coefficient: 2.812; odds ratio: 16.64) and emotional state (coefficient: 1.610; odds ratio: 5.00) were rated as the most important by parents.
CONCLUSION: The study provides a valuable insight into parents' preferences regarding treatment for their child with ADHD. If physicians can incorporate this information into their treatment plans for children with ADHD, greater concordance regarding treatment goals, adherence with therapy and, ultimately, clinical outcomes may be achieved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21671692     DOI: 10.1586/erp.11.22

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res        ISSN: 1473-7167            Impact factor:   2.217


  12 in total

1.  Using Best-Worst Scaling to Measure Caregiver Preferences for Managing their Child's ADHD: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Susan dosReis; Xinyi Ng; Emily Frosch; Gloria Reeves; Charles Cunningham; John F P Bridges
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.883

Review 2.  A descriptive review on methods to prioritize outcomes in a health care context.

Authors:  Inger M Janssen; Ansgar Gerhardus; Milly A Schröer-Günther; Fülöp Scheibler
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-08-25       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 3.  Systematic Review of Patients' and Parents' Preferences for ADHD Treatment Options and Processes of Care.

Authors:  Nicole K Schatz; Gregory A Fabiano; Charles E Cunningham; Susan dosReis; Daniel A Waschbusch; Stephanie Jerome; Kellina Lupas; Karen L Morris
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.883

4.  A Latent Class Analysis to Identify Variation in Caregivers' Preferences for their Child's Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Treatment: Do Stated Preferences Match Current Treatment?

Authors:  Xinyi Ng; John F P Bridges; Melissa M Ross; Emily Frosch; Gloria Reeves; Charles E Cunningham; Susan dosReis
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 3.883

5.  Caregiver Treatment Preferences for Children with a New Versus Existing Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Diagnosis.

Authors:  Susan dosReis; Alex Park; Xinyi Ng; Emily Frosch; Gloria Reeves; Charles Cunningham; Ellen M Janssen; John F P Bridges
Journal:  J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 2.576

Review 6.  Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Michael D Clark; Domino Determann; Stavros Petrou; Domenico Moro; Esther W de Bekker-Grob
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 4.981

7.  Racial-Ethnic Differences in Patterns of Discontinuous Medication Treatment Among Medicaid-Insured Youths With ADHD.

Authors:  Xu Ji; Benjamin G Druss; Cathy Lally; Janet R Cummings
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 3.084

Review 8.  Amfetamine and methylphenidate medications for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: complementary treatment options.

Authors:  Paul Hodgkins; Monica Shaw; David Coghill; Lily Hechtman
Journal:  Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 4.785

9.  Eliciting preferences for continuing medication among adult patients and parents of children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder.

Authors:  Muhammad Umair Khan; Camila Balbontin; Michiel C J Bliemer; Parisa Aslani
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 3.318

Review 10.  Mental health service preferences of patients and providers: a scoping review of conjoint analysis and discrete choice experiments from global public health literature over the last 20 years (1999-2019).

Authors:  Anna Larsen; Albert Tele; Manasi Kumar
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.