OBJECTIVE: To provide a comprehensive source of information about the reprogramming process and induced pluripotency. BACKGROUND: The ability of stem cells to renew their own population and to differentiate into specialized cell types has always attracted researchers looking to exploit this potential for cellular replacement therapies, pharmaceutical testing and studying developmental pathways. While adult stem cell therapy has already been brought to the clinic, embryonic stem cell research has been beset with legal and ethical impediments. FOCUS: The conversion of human somatic cells to human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs), which are equivalent to human embryonic stem cells (hESCs), provides a system to sidestep these barriers and expedite pluripotent stem cell research for the aforementioned purposes. However, being a very recent discovery, iPSCs have yet to overcome many other obstacles and criticism to be proven safe and feasible for clinical use. METHODOLOGY: This review introduces iPSC, the various methods that have been used to generate them and their pros and cons. It also covers in detail the pluripotency factors responsible for iPSC generation as well as the signaling pathways, epigenetic modifications and miRNA regulation implicated in the reprogramming process. The known molecular crosstalk between these reprogramming regulators is also illuminated. We will also mention the molecular compounds which have been shown to either replace one or more genetic factors or improve overall efficiency and kinetics of iPSC induction. CONCLUSION: To conclude, we will briefly discuss the current problems that hinder bench to bedside translation of iPSC research as well as the possible steps that can bring iPSC therapy and other potential applications closer to fruition.
OBJECTIVE: To provide a comprehensive source of information about the reprogramming process and induced pluripotency. BACKGROUND: The ability of stem cells to renew their own population and to differentiate into specialized cell types has always attracted researchers looking to exploit this potential for cellular replacement therapies, pharmaceutical testing and studying developmental pathways. While adult stem cell therapy has already been brought to the clinic, embryonic stem cell research has been beset with legal and ethical impediments. FOCUS: The conversion of human somatic cells to human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs), which are equivalent to human embryonic stem cells (hESCs), provides a system to sidestep these barriers and expedite pluripotent stem cell research for the aforementioned purposes. However, being a very recent discovery, iPSCs have yet to overcome many other obstacles and criticism to be proven safe and feasible for clinical use. METHODOLOGY: This review introduces iPSC, the various methods that have been used to generate them and their pros and cons. It also covers in detail the pluripotency factors responsible for iPSC generation as well as the signaling pathways, epigenetic modifications and miRNA regulation implicated in the reprogramming process. The known molecular crosstalk between these reprogramming regulators is also illuminated. We will also mention the molecular compounds which have been shown to either replace one or more genetic factors or improve overall efficiency and kinetics of iPSC induction. CONCLUSION: To conclude, we will briefly discuss the current problems that hinder bench to bedside translation of iPSC research as well as the possible steps that can bring iPSC therapy and other potential applications closer to fruition.
Authors: Nimet Maherali; Rupa Sridharan; Wei Xie; Jochen Utikal; Sarah Eminli; Katrin Arnold; Matthias Stadtfeld; Robin Yachechko; Jason Tchieu; Rudolf Jaenisch; Kathrin Plath; Konrad Hochedlinger Journal: Cell Stem Cell Date: 2007-06-07 Impact factor: 24.633
Authors: Rutger-Jan Swijnenburg; Sonja Schrepfer; Johannes A Govaert; Feng Cao; Katie Ransohoff; Ahmad Y Sheikh; Munif Haddad; Andrew J Connolly; Mark M Davis; Robert C Robbins; Joseph C Wu Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2008-08-26 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Pu Yang; Chenshuang Li; Min Lee; Anna Marzvanyan; Zhihe Zhao; Kang Ting; Chia Soo; Zhong Zheng Journal: Tissue Eng Part A Date: 2020-06-02 Impact factor: 3.845
Authors: Hossein Nejadnik; Sebastian Diecke; Olga D Lenkov; Fanny Chapelin; Jessica Donig; Xinming Tong; Nikita Derugin; Ray C F Chan; Amitabh Gaur; Fan Yang; Joseph C Wu; Heike E Daldrup-Link Journal: Stem Cell Rev Rep Date: 2015-04 Impact factor: 5.739