Literature DB >> 21670943

The anatomic and radiographic measurement of C2 lamina in Chinese population.

Liu Xin-yu1, Zhang Kai, Gong Laing-tai, Zheng Yan-ping, Li Jian-min.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In this study, we performed anatomic and computed tomography (CT) measurements of C2 lamina in Chinese people in order to provide the anatomic and radiographic data, and to verify the clinical applicability of trans-lamina screws to this population.
METHODS: The anatomic and radiographic measurement was conducted on two separate groups, group A and group B. In group A, a total of 96 human adult (male 51, female 45) cadaver spines were included. The minimal height (H1), thickness (T), length (L1) of C2 lamina, height of the root of lamina (H2), distance from the entry point to the lateral rim of lamina (L2) and to the lateral rim of lateral mass (L3) were bilaterally measured using high precision calipers. The spino-laminar angles (angle A) were also included. In group B, a total of 112 volunteers (male 58, female 54) without upper cervical abnormality were enrolled. Angle A, H1, T, L1, H2, L2 and L3 were bilaterally measured using plain X-rays and reconstruction CT. All measurements were taken at the thinnest part of the lamina in the axial and coronal plane.
RESULTS: All the measurements (except angle A) in males were significantly higher than those in females (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the values of bilateral laminae between group A and group B (P > 0.05). The thickness of 45% specimens was less than 6 mm. The length of lamina in all specimens was less than 2.5 cm, while only 5% of the specimens had a length of >3 cm from the entry point to the rim of lamina. The length from the entry point to the lateral rim of lateral mass was between 2.5 and 4.6 cm. In contrast, the length of only 5% specimens was longer than 4 cm.
CONCLUSIONS: The preoperative radiographic evaluation is very important to determine the suitable size of screws. The diameter of screws is mainly restricted by the thickness of C2 lamina. It is safe to use screws with a length of 2.5-3.0 cm for Chinese people. The radiographic measurement method we used is simple, accurate and reliable for preoperative measurement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21670943      PMCID: PMC3229735          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-011-1876-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  16 in total

1.  C2 crossing laminar screws: cadaveric morphometric analysis.

Authors:  Michael Y Wang
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.654

2.  Anatomic considerations for the placement of C2 laminar screws.

Authors:  Ezequiel H Cassinelli; Michael Lee; Anthony Skalak; Nicholas U Ahn; Neill M Wright
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Application of laminar screws to posterior fusion of cervical spine: measurement of the cervical vertebral arch diameter with a navigation system.

Authors:  Kazuo Nakanishi; Masato Tanaka; Yoshihisa Sugimoto; Haruo Misawa; Tomoyuki Takigawa; Kazuo Fujiwara; Keiichiro Nishida; Toshifumi Ozaki
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-03-15       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Correlation between computed tomography measurements and direct anatomic measurements of the axis for consideration of C2 laminar screw placement.

Authors:  Clayton L Dean; Michael J Lee; Mark Robbin; Ezequiel H Cassinelli
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2008-08-30       Impact factor: 4.166

5.  Posterior C1-C2 fusion with polyaxial screw and rod fixation.

Authors:  J Harms; R P Melcher
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Accuracy of intraoperative plain radiographs to detect violations of intralaminar screws placed into the C2 vertebrae: a reliability study.

Authors:  Ronald A Lehman; Rick C Sasso; Melvin D Helgeson; Anton E Dmitriev; Norman W Gill; Michael R Rosner; K Daniel Riew
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Posterior C1-C2 transarticular screw fixation for atlantoaxial arthrodesis.

Authors:  C A Dickman; V K Sonntag
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.654

8.  The interspinous method of posterior atlantoaxial arthrodesis.

Authors:  C A Dickman; V K Sonntag; S M Papadopoulos; M N Hadley
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 5.115

9.  Laminar screw fixation of the axis.

Authors:  Daniel M Sciubba; Joseph C Noggle; Ananth K Vellimana; James E Conway; Ryan M Kretzer; Donlin M Long; Ira M Garonzik
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2008-04

10.  Primary posterior fusion C1/2 in odontoid fractures: indications, technique, and results of transarticular screw fixation.

Authors:  B Jeanneret; F Magerl
Journal:  J Spinal Disord       Date:  1992-12
View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Anatomical considerations of C2 lamina for the placement of translaminar screw: a review of the literature.

Authors:  D Chytas; D S Korres; G C Babis; N E Efstathopoulos; E C Papadopoulos; K Markatos; V S Nikolaou
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2017-11-08

2.  Morphological study of the posterior osseous structures of subaxial cervical spine in a population from northeastern China.

Authors:  Zhenyu Wang; Jiali Leng; Jianhua Liu; Yi Liu
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 2.359

3.  Morphometric Analysis and Classification of the Cross-Sectional Shape of the C2 Lamina.

Authors:  Soyeon Kim; Dai-Soon Kwak; In-Beom Kim
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Freehand C2 Laminar Screw Placement: Technical Note and Operative Video.

Authors:  William Clifton; Jose O Garcia; Aaron Damon; Kingsley Abode-Iyamah; Mark Pichelmann
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2019-09-01

5.  Morphometric and radiological assessments of dimensions of Axis in dry vertebrae: A study in Indian population.

Authors:  Raman Mohan Sharma; Nupur Pruthi; Paritosh Pandey; Rose Dawn; Yogitha Ravindranath; Roopa Ravindranath
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.251

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.