Literature DB >> 21670773

Impact of a population-based colorectal cancer screening program on local health services demand in Italy: a 7-year survey in a northern province.

Fabrizio Parente1, Barbara Marino, Antonio Ardizzoia, Giovanni Ucci, Antonina Ilardo, Fabrizio Limonta, Patrizia Villani, Roberto Moretti, Alberto Zucchi, Marco Cremaschini, Maria Elena Pirola.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: In 2005, the National Health Service recommended a population-based colorectal cancer (CRC) screening program using biennial fecal occult blood testing (FOBT), followed by total colonoscopy in positive patients. So far, no studies have been performed to evaluate the impact of a mass-screening CRC campaign on the health system services at the community level in Italy. We have therefore assessed the workload generated by the first two biennial rounds of screening program on the activity of hospital services involved in CRC diagnosis in the Lecco province.
METHODS: Routine data from all hospital services of our province were collected on activity levels related to CRC diagnosis from January 2003 to December 2009. This time span covered the 2 years prior to, as well as the two biennial rounds of the CRC screening program. In particular, we focused on the volume of outpatient FOBTs and colonoscopies (both diagnostic and interventional) performed among subjects outside the screening program. Joinpoint models were used to test whether an apparent change in trend of examination over time was statistically significant in different age cohorts of the population (<50 years, 50-69 years, and ≥70 years).
RESULTS: The volume of "extra-screening" per-patient/FOBTs and colonoscopies increased significantly over the evaluated periods in all ages, until year 2008, when a steady trend was beginning; the AAPCs (average of the annual percent changes) values were 5.7, 3.1, and 8.4 for FOBT and 14.6, 13.4, and 16.7 for colonoscopy in the three age cohorts, respectively. However, the increase in both FOBT and colonoscopy demand was maximal in the cohort ≥70 years, where three statistically significant annual percent changes (APCs) were identified (in 2003-2005, 2005-2006, and 2006-2007 APCs were 12.3, 14.9, and 15.9 for FOBT, and 18.7, 36.8, and 25.4 for colonoscopy, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: After the implementation of a FOBT-based mass-screening program for CRC, careful consideration must be given to the significant increase in the workload of hospital services involved in CRC diagnosis, outside the screening campaign. The extra-work mainly involves gastroenterologists performing colonoscopy, whose activity increased over the 5-year period by 118%, as well as laboratory services, where the demand of FOBTs rose by 40%. This phenomenon, mainly attributable to a profound change in the attitude toward CRC screening by those age cohorts outside the program, covers a time span of two full rounds of screening, whereupon a steady trend for colonoscopy is apparent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21670773     DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2011.185

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  10 in total

1.  Bisacodyl plus split 2-L polyethylene glycol-citrate-simethicone improves quality of bowel preparation before screening colonoscopy.

Authors:  Flavio Valiante; Angelo Bellumat; Manuela De Bona; Michele De Boni
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-09-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Colorectal cancer screening--optimizing current strategies and new directions.

Authors:  Ernst J Kuipers; Thomas Rösch; Michael Bretthauer
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 66.675

3.  Anatomic distribution of cancers and colorectal adenomas according to age and sex and relationship between proximal and distal neoplasms in an i-FOBT-positive average-risk Italian screening cohort.

Authors:  F Parente; S Bargiggia; C Boemo; C Vailati; E Bonoldi; A Ardizzoia; A Ilardo; F Tortorella; S Gallus
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2013-08-24       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Bringing top-end endoscopy to regional australia: hurdles and benefits.

Authors:  J Van Den Bogaerde; D Sorrentino
Journal:  Diagn Ther Endosc       Date:  2012-09-09

5.  Long-Term Prediction of the Demand of Colonoscopies Generated by a Population-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Program.

Authors:  Mercè Comas; Joan Mendivil; Montserrat Andreu; Cristina Hernández; Xavier Castells
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  A wide variation of the quality of colonoscopy reporting system in the real clinical practice in southeastern area of Korea.

Authors:  Jung Min Lee; Yu Jin Kang; Eun Soo Kim; Yoo Jin Lee; Kyung Sik Park; Kwang Bum Cho; Seong Woo Jeon; Min Kyu Jung; Hyun Seok Lee; Eun Young Kim; Jin Tae Jung; Byung Ik Jang; Kyeong Ok Kim; Yun Jin Chung; Chang Hun Yang
Journal:  Intest Res       Date:  2016-10-17

7.  Fecal Occult Blood Test Results of the National Colorectal Cancer Screening Program in South Korea (2006-2013).

Authors:  John Hoon Rim; Taemi Youk; Jung Gu Kang; Byung Kyu Park; Heon Yung Gee; Jeong-Ho Kim; Jongha Yoo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-06-05       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Dedicated staff for patient education improves bowel preparation quality and reduces the cecal intubation time of colonoscopy: A single institution retrospective study.

Authors:  Yu-Tse Chiu; Chen-Ya Kuo; Fu-Jen Lee; Chi-Yang Chang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 1.817

9.  Socioeconomic variation in uptake of colonoscopy following a positive faecal occult blood test result: a retrospective analysis of the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme.

Authors:  S Morris; G Baio; E Kendall; C von Wagner; J Wardle; W Atkin; S P Halloran; G Handley; R F Logan; A Obichere; S Rainbow; S Smith; J Snowball; R Raine
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Clinical Characteristics and Mortality of Life-Threatening Events Requiring Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Units.

Authors:  Hye Min Park; Eun Soo Kim; Sang Min Lee; Yoo Jin Lee; Kyung Sik Park; Kwang Bum Cho; Eun Young Kim; Jin Tae Jung; Kyeong Ok Kim; Byung Ik Jang; Yun Jin Jung; Chang Hun Yang; Hyun Seok Lee; Seong Woo Jeon
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.817

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.