Literature DB >> 21670714

A randomized and blinded single-center trial comparing the effect of intracranial pressure and intracranial pressure wave amplitude-guided intensive care management on early clinical state and 12-month outcome in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Per Kristian Eide1, Gunnar Bentsen, Angelika G Sorteberg, Pål Bache Marthinsen, Audun Stubhaug, Wilhelm Sorteberg.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), preliminary results indicate that the amplitude of the single intracranial pressure (ICP) wave is a better predictor of the early clinical state and 6-month outcome than the mean ICP.
OBJECTIVE: To perform a randomized and blinded single-center trial comparing the effect of mean ICP vs mean ICP wave amplitude (MWA)-guided intensive care management on early clinical state and outcome in patients with aneurysmal SAH.
METHODS: Patients were randomized to 2 different types of ICP management: maintenance of mean ICP less than 20 mm Hg and MWA less than 5 mm Hg. Early clinical state was assessed daily using the Glasgow Coma Scale. The primary efficacy variable was 12-month outcome in terms of the Rankin Stroke Score.
RESULTS: Ninety-seven patients were included in the study. There were no significant differences in treatment between the 2 groups apart from a larger volume of cerebrospinal fluid drained during week 1 in the MWA group. There was a tendency toward higher Glasgow Coma Scale scores in the MWA group during weeks 1 (P = .08) and 2 (P = .07). Outcome in terms of Rankin Stroke Score at 12 months was significantly better in the MWA group (P < .05).
CONCLUSION: This randomized and blinded trial disclosed a significant better primary efficacy variable (Rankin Stroke Score after 12 months) in the MWA patient group. We suggest that proactive intensive care management with MWA-tailored cerebrospinal fluid drainage during the first week improves aneurysmal SAH outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21670714     DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e318227e0e1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  12 in total

1.  An evaluation of three measures of intracranial compliance in traumatic brain injury patients.

Authors:  Tim Howells; Anders Lewén; Mattias K Sköld; Elisabeth Ronne-Engström; Per Enblad
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  The Use of Standardized Management Protocols for Critically Ill Patients with Non-traumatic Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Shaurya Taran; Vatsal Trivedi; Jeffrey M Singh; Shane W English; Victoria A McCredie
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 3.210

3.  An intracranial pressure-derived index monitored simultaneously from two separate sensors in patients with cerebral bleeds: comparison of findings.

Authors:  Per Kristian Eide; Wilhelm Sorteberg
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 2.819

4.  Simultaneous monitoring of static and dynamic intracranial pressure parameters from two separate sensors in patients with cerebral bleeds: comparison of findings.

Authors:  Per Kristian Eide; Sverre Holm; Wilhelm Sorteberg
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2012-09-07       Impact factor: 2.819

5.  Principles of cerebral hemodynamics when intracranial pressure is raised: lessons from the peripheral circulation.

Authors:  Mi Ok Kim; Audrey Adji; Michael F O'Rourke; Alberto P Avolio; Peter Smielewski; John D Pickard; Marek Czosnyka
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.844

6.  Baseline pressure errors (BPEs) extensively influence intracranial pressure scores: results of a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Per Kristian Eide; Angelika Sorteberg; Torstein R Meling; Wilhelm Sorteberg
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 2.819

7.  The effect of baseline pressure errors on an intracranial pressure-derived index: results of a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Per Kristian Eide; Angelika Sorteberg; Torstein R Meling; Wilhelm Sorteberg
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 2.819

Review 8.  The best marker for guiding the clinical management of patients with raised intracranial pressure-the RAP index or the mean pulse amplitude?

Authors:  Allan Hall; Roddy O'Kane
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2016-08-27       Impact factor: 2.216

9.  Non-invasive Estimation of the Intracranial Pressure Waveform from the Central Arterial Blood Pressure Waveform in Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Patients.

Authors:  Karen Brastad Evensen; Michael O'Rourke; Fabrice Prieur; Sverre Holm; Per Kristian Eide
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  Measuring intracranial pressure by invasive, less invasive or non-invasive means: limitations and avenues for improvement.

Authors:  Karen Brastad Evensen; Per Kristian Eide
Journal:  Fluids Barriers CNS       Date:  2020-05-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.