Literature DB >> 21670319

Obstetrician-gynaecologists' opinions about conscientious refusal of a request for abortion: results from a national vignette experiment.

Kenneth A Rasinski1, John D Yoon, Youssef G Kalad, Farr A Curlin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Conscientious refusal of abortion has been discussed widely by medical ethicists but little information on practitioners' opinions exists. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) issued recommendations about conscientious refusal. We used a vignette experiment to examine obstetrician-gynecologists' (OB/GYN) support for the recommendations.
DESIGN: A national survey of OB/GYN physicians contained a vignette experiment in which an OB/GYN doctor refused a requested elective abortion. The vignette varied two issues recently addressed by the ACOG ethics committee--whether the doctor referred and whether the doctor disclosed their objection to the abortion. PARTICIPANTS AND
SETTING: 1800 OB/GYN randomly selected physicians were asked to complete a mail survey containing the vignette. The response rate was 66% (n=1154) after excluding 40 ineligible cases. MEASUREMENT: Physicians indicated their approval for the vignette doctor's decision. MAIN
RESULTS: Overall, 43% of OB/GYN physicians responded that the conscientious refusal exercised by the vignette physician was appropriate. 70% rated the vignette doctor as acting appropriately when a referral was made. This dropped to 51% when the doctor disclosed objections to the patient, and to 12% when the doctor disclosed objections and refused to make a referral. Consistent with previous research, males were more likely to support disclosure and refusal to refer. Highly religious physicians supported non-referral but not disclosure.
CONCLUSION: OB/GYN physicians are less likely to support conscientious refusal of abortion if physicians disclose their objections to patients. This is at odds with ACOG recommendations and with some models of the doctor-patient relationship.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21670319     DOI: 10.1136/jme.2010.040782

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  3 in total

1.  Predictors of Physician Recommendation for Ethically Controversial Medical Procedures: Findings from an Exploratory National Survey of American Muslim Physicians.

Authors:  Sundus Mahdi; Obadah Ghannam; Sydeaka Watson; Aasim I Padela
Journal:  J Relig Health       Date:  2016-04

2.  A national survey of obstetricians' attitudes toward and practice of periviable intervention.

Authors:  B Tucker Edmonds; F McKenzie; V Farrow; G Raglan; J Schulkin
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 2.521

3.  The NERSH Questionnaire and Pool of Data from 12 Countries: Development and Description.

Authors:  Niels Christian Hvidt; Farr Curlin; Arndt Büssing; Klaus Baumann; Eckhard Frick; Jens Søndergaard; Jesper Bo Nielsen; Ryan Lawrence; Giancarlo Lucchetti; Parameshwaran Ramakrishnan; Inga Wermuth; René Hefti; Eunmi Lee; Alex Kappel Kørup
Journal:  J Relig Health       Date:  2021-10-01
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.