Literature DB >> 21669880

How agro-ecological research helps to address food security issues under new IPM and pesticide reduction policies for global crop production systems.

A Nicholas E Birch1, Graham S Begg, Geoffrey R Squire.   

Abstract

Drivers behind food security and crop protection issues are discussed in relation to food losses caused by pests. Pests globally consume food estimated to feed an additional one billion people. Key drivers include rapid human population increase, climate change, loss of beneficial on-farm biodiversity, reduction in per capita cropped land, water shortages, and EU pesticide withdrawals under policies relating to 91/414 EEC. IPM (Integrated Pest Management) will be compulsory for all EU agriculture by 2014 and is also being widely adopted globally. IPM offers a 'toolbox' of complementary crop- and region-specific crop protection solutions to address these rising pressures. IPM aims for more sustainable solutions by using complementary technologies. The applied research challenge now is to reduce selection pressure on single solution strategies, by creating additive/synergistic interactions between IPM components. IPM is compatible with organic, conventional, and GM cropping systems and is flexible, allowing regional fine-tuning. It reduces pests below economic thresholds utilizing key 'ecological services', particularly biocontrol. A recent global review demonstrates that IPM can reduce pesticide use and increase yields of most of the major crops studied. Landscape scale 'ecological engineering', together with genetic improvement of new crop varieties, will enhance the durability of pest-resistant cultivars (conventional and GM). IPM will also promote compatibility with semiochemicals, biopesticides, precision pest monitoring tools, and rapid diagnostics. These combined strategies are urgently needed and are best achieved via multi-disciplinary research, including complex spatio-temporal modelling at farm and landscape scales. Integrative and synergistic use of existing and new IPM technologies will help meet future food production needs more sustainably in developed and developing countries, in an era of reduced pesticide availability. Current IPM research gaps are identified and discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21669880     DOI: 10.1093/jxb/err064

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Bot        ISSN: 0022-0957            Impact factor:   6.992


  22 in total

Review 1.  Sustainable intensification in agricultural systems.

Authors:  Jules Pretty; Zareen Pervez Bharucha
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  Environmental risk assessment of blight-resistant potato: use of a crop model to quantify nitrogen cycling at scales of the field and cropping system.

Authors:  Mark W Young; Ewen Mullins; Geoffrey R Squire
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Canopy light and plant health.

Authors:  Carlos L Ballaré; Carlos A Mazza; Amy T Austin; Ronald Pierik
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2012-07-16       Impact factor: 8.340

4.  A new insight into arable weed adaptive evolution: mutations endowing herbicide resistance also affect germination dynamics and seedling emergence.

Authors:  Christophe Délye; Yosra Menchari; Séverine Michel; Emilie Cadet; Valérie Le Corre
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 4.357

Review 5.  Culturable Yeasts as Biofertilizers and Biopesticides for a Sustainable Agriculture: A Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  María Hernández-Fernández; Gustavo Cordero-Bueso; Marina Ruiz-Muñoz; Jesús M Cantoral
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-21

6.  Integrated Pest Management for Sustainable Intensification of Agriculture in Asia and Africa.

Authors:  Jules Pretty; Zareen Pervez Bharucha
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 2.769

7.  Injury Profile SIMulator, a qualitative aggregative modelling framework to predict crop injury profile as a function of cropping practices, and the abiotic and biotic environment. I. Conceptual bases.

Authors:  Jean-Noël Aubertot; Marie-Hélène Robin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Injury profile SIMulator, a Qualitative aggregative modelling framework to predict injury profile as a function of cropping practices, and abiotic and biotic environment. II. Proof of concept: design of IPSIM-wheat-eyespot.

Authors:  Marie-Hélène Robin; Nathalie Colbach; Philippe Lucas; Françoise Montfort; Célia Cholez; Philippe Debaeke; Jean-Noël Aubertot
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  How can we exploit above-belowground interactions to assist in addressing the challenges of food security?

Authors:  Peter Orrell; Alison E Bennett
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 5.753

10.  Ecoinformatics can reveal yield gaps associated with crop-pest interactions: a proof-of-concept.

Authors:  Jay A Rosenheim; Matthew H Meisner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-15       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.