Literature DB >> 21669830

Predictability of phenotypic differentiation across flow regimes in fishes.

R Brian Langerhans1.   

Abstract

Fish inhabit environments greatly varying in intensity of water velocity, and these flow regimes are generally believed to be of major evolutionary significance. To what extent does water flow drive repeatable and predictable phenotypic differentiation? Although many investigators have examined phenotypic variation across flow gradients in fishes, no clear consensus regarding the nature of water velocity's effects on phenotypic diversity has yet emerged. Here, I describe a generalized model that produces testable hypotheses of morphological and locomotor differentiation between flow regimes in fishes. The model combines biomechanical information (describing how fish morphology determines locomotor abilities) with ecological information (describing how locomotor performance influences fitness) to yield predictions of divergent natural selection and phenotypic differentiation between low-flow and high-flow environments. To test the model's predictions of phenotypic differentiation, I synthesized the existing literature and conducted a meta-analysis. Based on results gathered from 80 studies, providing 115 tests of predictions, the model produced some accurate results across both intraspecific and interspecific scales, as differences in body shape, caudal fin shape, and steady-swimming performance strongly matched predictions. These results suggest that water flow drives predictable phenotypic variation in disparate groups of fish based on a common, generalized model, and that microevolutionary processes might often scale up to generate broader, interspecific patterns. However, too few studies have examined differentiation in body stiffness, muscle architecture, or unsteady-swimming performance to draw clear conclusions for those traits. The analysis revealed that, at the intraspecific scale, both genetic divergence and phenotypic plasticity play important roles in phenotypic differentiation across flow regimes, but we do not yet know the relative importance of these two sources of phenotypic variation. Moreover, while major patterns within and between species were predictable, we have little direct evidence regarding the role of water flow in driving speciation or generating broad, macroevolutionary patterns, as too few studies have addressed these topics or conducted analyses within a phylogenetic framework. Thus, flow regime does indeed drive some predictable phenotypic outcomes, but many questions remain unanswered. This study establishes a general model for predicting phenotypic differentiation across flow regimes in fishes, and should help guide future studies in fruitful directions, thereby enhancing our understanding of the predictability of phenotypic variation in nature.

Entities:  

Year:  2008        PMID: 21669830     DOI: 10.1093/icb/icn092

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Integr Comp Biol        ISSN: 1540-7063            Impact factor:   3.326


  44 in total

1.  Morphological responses of a stream fish to water impoundment.

Authors:  Travis C Haas; Michael J Blum; David C Heins
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Three different patterns of how low-intensity waves can affect the energy budget of littoral fish: a mesocosm study.

Authors:  Stefan Stoll; Philipp Fischer
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2010-10-16       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Shared and unique morphological responses of stream fishes to anthropogenic habitat alteration.

Authors:  Nathan R Franssen; Jared Harris; Scott R Clark; Jacob F Schaefer; Laura K Stewart
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Integrating environmental variation, predation pressure, phenotypic plasticity and locomotor performance.

Authors:  Shi-Jian Fu; Zhen-Dong Cao; Guan-Jie Yan; Cheng Fu; Xu Pang
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 5.  Speciation through the lens of biomechanics: locomotion, prey capture and reproductive isolation.

Authors:  Timothy E Higham; Sean M Rogers; R Brian Langerhans; Heather A Jamniczky; George V Lauder; William J Stewart; Christopher H Martin; David N Reznick
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Effects of acclimation temperature on the thermal tolerance, hypoxia tolerance and swimming performance of two endangered fish species in China.

Authors:  Long-Yan Zhou; Shi-Jian Fu; Cheng Fu; Hong Ling; Xiu-Ming Li
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2019-01-04       Impact factor: 2.200

7.  Superfetation in live-bearing fishes is not always the result of a morphological constraint.

Authors:  Patricia Frías-Alvarez; J Jaime Zúñiga-Vega
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Localised intraspecific variation in the swimming phenotype of a coral reef fish across different wave exposures.

Authors:  Sandra A Binning; Dominique G Roche; Christopher J Fulton
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Limited capacity for acclimation of thermal physiology in a salamander, Desmognathus brimleyorum.

Authors:  Vanessa K H Young; Matthew E Gifford
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 2.200

10.  Evolutionary inferences from the analysis of exchangeability.

Authors:  Andrew P Hendry; Renaud Kaeuffer; Erika Crispo; Catherine L Peichel; Daniel I Bolnick
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 3.694

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.