Literature DB >> 21669757

Key transitions during the evolution of animal phototransduction: novelty, "tree-thinking," co-option, and co-duplication.

David C Plachetzki1, Todd H Oakley.   

Abstract

Biologists are amazed by the intricacy and complexity of biological interactions between molecules, cells, organisms, and ecosystems. Yet underlying all this biodiversity is a universal common ancestry. How does evolution proceed from common starting points to generate the riotous biodiversity we see today? This "novelty problem"-understanding how novelty and common ancestry relate-has become of critical importance, especially since the realization that genes and developmental processes are often conserved across vast phylogenetic distances. In particular, two processes have emerged as the primary generators of diversity in organismal form: duplication plus divergence and co-option. In this article, we first illustrate how phylogenetic methodology and "tree-thinking" can be used to distinguish duplication plus divergence from co-option. Second, we review two case studies in photoreceptor evolution-one suggesting a role for duplication plus divergence, the other exemplifying how co-option can shape evolutionary change. Finally, we discuss how our tree-thinking approach differs from other treatments of the origin of novelty that utilized a "linear-thinking" approach in which evolution is viewed as a linear and gradual progression, often from simple to complex phenotype, driven by natural selection.

Year:  2007        PMID: 21669757     DOI: 10.1093/icb/icm050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Integr Comp Biol        ISSN: 1540-7063            Impact factor:   3.326


  17 in total

Review 1.  Speed, sensitivity, and stability of the light response in rod and cone photoreceptors: facts and models.

Authors:  Juan I Korenbrot
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 21.198

2.  Origin of the genetic components of the vomeronasal system in the common ancestor of all extant vertebrates.

Authors:  Wendy E Grus; Jianzhi Zhang
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2008-11-13       Impact factor: 16.240

Review 3.  Evolution of vertebrate rod and cone phototransduction genes.

Authors:  Dan Larhammar; Karin Nordström; Tomas A Larsson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-10-12       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 4.  Eye evolution: common use and independent recruitment of genetic components.

Authors:  Pavel Vopalensky; Zbynek Kozmik
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-10-12       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  The evolution of phototransduction from an ancestral cyclic nucleotide gated pathway.

Authors:  David C Plachetzki; Caitlin R Fong; Todd H Oakley
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Gene duplication and the origins of morphological complexity in pancrustacean eyes, a genomic approach.

Authors:  Ajna S Rivera; M Sabrina Pankey; David C Plachetzki; Carlos Villacorta; Anna E Syme; Jeanne M Serb; Angela R Omilian; Todd H Oakley
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2010-04-30       Impact factor: 3.260

7.  Evidence of behavioral co-option from context-dependent variation in mandible use in trap-jaw ants (Odontomachus spp.).

Authors:  Joseph C Spagna; Adam Schelkopf; Tiana Carrillo; Andrew V Suarez
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2008-11-28

8.  Limitations of gene duplication models: evolution of modules in protein interaction networks.

Authors:  Frank Emmert-Streib
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  A new look at some old animals.

Authors:  Neil W Blackstone
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 8.029

Review 10.  The evolution of eyes and visually guided behaviour.

Authors:  Dan-Eric Nilsson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-10-12       Impact factor: 6.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.