Literature DB >> 21669697

Temporal vegetation dynamics and recolonization mechanisms on different-sized soil disturbances in tallgrass prairie.

W E Rogers1, D C Hartnett.   

Abstract

Assessing the various mechanisms by which plants revegetate disturbances is important for understanding the effects of disturbances on plant population dynamics, plant community structure, community assembly processes, and ecosystem function. We initiated a 2-yr experiment examining temporal vegetation dynamics and mechanisms of recolonization on different-sized soil disturbances created to simulate pocket gopher mounds in North American tallgrass prairie. Treatments were designed to assess potential contributions of the seed rain, soil seed bank, clonal propagation from the edges of a soil mound, and regrowth of buried plants. Small mounds were more rapidly recolonized than large mounds. Vegetative regrowth strategies were the dominant recolonization mechanisms, while the seed rain was considerably less important in maintaining the diversity of forbs and annuals than previously believed. All recolonization mechanisms influenced plant succession, but stem densities and plant mass on soil mounds remained significantly lower than undisturbed controls after two growing seasons. Because natural pocket gopher mounds are indistinguishable from undisturbed areas after two seasons, these results suggest that multiple modes of recruitment concurrently, albeit differentially, contribute to the recolonization of soil disturbances and influence tallgrass prairie plant community structure and successional dynamics.

Year:  2001        PMID: 21669697

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Bot        ISSN: 0002-9122            Impact factor:   3.844


  6 in total

Review 1.  Gopher mounds decrease nutrient cycling rates and increase adjacent vegetation in volcanic primary succession.

Authors:  Raymond P Yurkewycz; John G Bishop; Charles M Crisafulli; John A Harrison; Richard A Gill
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-09-27       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Belowground bud bank response to grazing under severe, short-term drought.

Authors:  Benjamin L VanderWeide; David C Hartnett
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2015-02-13       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  The ecology and significance of below-ground bud banks in plants.

Authors:  Jacqueline P Ott; Jitka Klimešová; David C Hartnett
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 4.357

4.  Responses of plant productivity and soil nutrient concentrations to different alpine grassland degradation levels.

Authors:  Hai Peng Xu; Jing Zhang; Xiao Pan Pang; Qian Wang; Wen Na Zhang; Juan Wang; Zheng Gang Guo
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2019-10-26       Impact factor: 2.513

5.  Resistance strategies of Phragmites australis (common reed) to Pb pollution in flood and drought conditions.

Authors:  Na Zhang; Jinwei Zhang; Zhiqiang Li; Jing Chen; Zhenhua Zhang; Chunsheng Mu
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  Grass bud responses to fire in a semiarid savanna system.

Authors:  Quinn A Hiers; Morgan L Treadwell; Matthew B Dickinson; Kathleen L Kavanagh; Alexandra G Lodge; Heath D Starns; Doug R Tolleson; Dirac Twidwell; Carissa L Wonkka; William E Rogers
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 2.912

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.