OBJECTIVE: To assess the availability and coverage of emergency obstetric care (EmOC) services in Zambia. METHODS: Reported provision of EmOC signal functions in the Zambian Health Facility Census and additional criteria on staffing, opening hours, and referral capacity were used to classify all Zambian health facilities as providing comprehensive EmOC, basic EmOC, or more limited care. Geographic accessibility of EmOC services was estimated by linking health facility data with data from the Zambian population census. RESULTS: Few Zambian health facilities provided all basic EmOC signal functions and had qualified health professionals available on a 24-hour basis. Of the 1131 Zambian delivery facilities, 135 (12%) were classified as providing EmOC. Zambia nearly met the UN EmOC density benchmarks nationally, but EmOC facilities and health professionals were unevenly distributed between provinces. Geographic access to EmOC services in rural areas was low; in most provinces, less than 25% of the population lived within 15 km of an EmOC facility. CONCLUSION: A national Health Facility Census with geographic information is a valuable tool for assessing service availability and coverage at national and subnational levels. Simultaneously assessing health worker density and geographic access adds crucial information.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the availability and coverage of emergency obstetric care (EmOC) services in Zambia. METHODS: Reported provision of EmOC signal functions in the Zambian Health Facility Census and additional criteria on staffing, opening hours, and referral capacity were used to classify all Zambian health facilities as providing comprehensive EmOC, basic EmOC, or more limited care. Geographic accessibility of EmOC services was estimated by linking health facility data with data from the Zambian population census. RESULTS: Few Zambian health facilities provided all basic EmOC signal functions and had qualified health professionals available on a 24-hour basis. Of the 1131 Zambian delivery facilities, 135 (12%) were classified as providing EmOC. Zambia nearly met the UN EmOC density benchmarks nationally, but EmOC facilities and health professionals were unevenly distributed between provinces. Geographic access to EmOC services in rural areas was low; in most provinces, less than 25% of the population lived within 15 km of an EmOC facility. CONCLUSION: A national Health Facility Census with geographic information is a valuable tool for assessing service availability and coverage at national and subnational levels. Simultaneously assessing health worker density and geographic access adds crucial information.
Authors: Tim Ensor; Cathy Green; Paula Quigley; Abdul Razak Badru; Dynes Kaluba; Tendayi Kureya Journal: Bull World Health Organ Date: 2013-11-04 Impact factor: 9.408
Authors: Gaurav Sharma; Matthews Mathai; Kim E Dickson; Andrew Weeks; G Hofmeyr; Tina Lavender; Louise Day; Jiji Mathews; Sue Fawcus; Aline Simen-Kapeu; Luc de Bernis Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Date: 2015-09-11 Impact factor: 3.007
Authors: Robin C Nesbitt; Terhi J Lohela; Alexander Manu; Linda Vesel; Eunice Okyere; Karen Edmond; Seth Owusu-Agyei; Betty R Kirkwood; Sabine Gabrysch Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-11-27 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Prem K Mony; Jayanna Krishnamurthy; Annamma Thomas; Kiruba Sankar; B M Ramesh; Stephen Moses; James Blanchard; Lisa Avery Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-05-22 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Michael K Mwaniki; Sonali Vaid; Isaac Mwamuye Chome; Dorcas Amolo; Youssef Tawfik Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2014-09-21 Impact factor: 2.655