Literature DB >> 21668904

Augmented cross-sectional studies with abbreviated follow-up for estimating HIV incidence.

B Claggett1, S W Lagakos, R Wang.   

Abstract

Cross-sectional HIV incidence estimation based on a sensitive and less-sensitive test offers great advantages over the traditional cohort study. However, its use has been limited due to concerns about the false negative rate of the less-sensitive test, reflecting the phenomenon that some subjects may remain negative permanently on the less-sensitive test. Wang and Lagakos (2010, Biometrics 66, 864-874) propose an augmented cross-sectional design that provides one way to estimate the size of the infected population who remain negative permanently and subsequently incorporate this information in the cross-sectional incidence estimator. In an augmented cross-sectional study, subjects who test negative on the less-sensitive test in the cross-sectional survey are followed forward for transition into the nonrecent state, at which time they would test positive on the less-sensitive test. However, considerable uncertainty exists regarding the appropriate length of follow-up and the size of the infected population who remain nonreactive permanently to the less-sensitive test. In this article, we assess the impact of varying follow-up time on the resulting incidence estimators from an augmented cross-sectional study, evaluate the robustness of cross-sectional estimators to assumptions about the existence and the size of the subpopulation who will remain negative permanently, and propose a new estimator based on abbreviated follow-up time (AF). Compared to the original estimator from an augmented cross-sectional study, the AF estimator allows shorter follow-up time and does not require estimation of the mean window period, defined as the average time between detectability of HIV infection with the sensitive and less-sensitive tests. It is shown to perform well in a wide range of settings. We discuss when the AF estimator would be expected to perform well and offer design considerations for an augmented cross-sectional study with abbreviated follow-up.
© 2011, The International Biometric Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21668904      PMCID: PMC3182305          DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2011.01632.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  13 in total

1.  On estimating the relation between blood group and disease.

Authors:  B WOOLF
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  1955-06       Impact factor: 1.670

2.  Improved HIV-1 incidence estimates using the BED capture enzyme immunoassay.

Authors:  John W Hargrove; Jean H Humphrey; Kuda Mutasa; Bharat S Parekh; J Steve McDougal; Robert Ntozini; Henry Chidawanyika; Lawrence H Moulton; Brian Ward; Kusum Nathoo; Peter J Iliff; Ekkehard Kopp
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2008-02-19       Impact factor: 4.177

3.  A Simplified Formula for Inferring HIV Incidence from Cross-Sectional Surveys Using a Test for Recent Infection.

Authors:  Alex Welte; Thomas A McWalter; Till Bärnighausen
Journal:  AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.205

4.  Should biomarker estimates of HIV incidence be adjusted?

Authors:  Ron Brookmeyer
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2009-02-20       Impact factor: 4.177

5.  Quantitative detection of increasing HIV type 1 antibodies after seroconversion: a simple assay for detecting recent HIV infection and estimating incidence.

Authors:  Bharat S Parekh; M Susan Kennedy; Trudy Dobbs; Chou-Pong Pau; Robert Byers; Timothy Green; Dale J Hu; Suphak Vanichseni; Nancy L Young; Kachit Choopanya; Timothy D Mastro; J Steven McDougal
Journal:  AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses       Date:  2002-03-01       Impact factor: 2.205

6.  Significantly diminished long-term specificity of the BED capture enzyme immunoassay among patients with HIV-1 with very low CD4 counts and those on antiretroviral therapy.

Authors:  Edmore T Marinda; John Hargrove; Wolfgang Preiser; Hannes Slabbert; Gert van Zyl; Jonathan Levin; Lawrence H Moulton; Alex Welte; Jean Humphrey
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 3.731

7.  On the use of adjusted cross-sectional estimators of HIV incidence.

Authors:  Rui Wang; Stephen W Lagakos
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.731

8.  Estimating HIV incidence based on combined prevalence testing.

Authors:  Raji Balasubramanian; Stephen W Lagakos
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2009-04-13       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Augmented cross-sectional prevalence testing for estimating HIV incidence.

Authors:  Rui Wang; Stephen W Lagakos
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  New testing strategy to detect early HIV-1 infection for use in incidence estimates and for clinical and prevention purposes.

Authors:  R S Janssen; G A Satten; S L Stramer; B D Rawal; T R O'Brien; B J Weiblen; F M Hecht; N Jack; F R Cleghorn; J O Kahn; M A Chesney; M P Busch
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-07-01       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  2 in total

1.  A likelihood estimation of HIV incidence incorporating information on past prevalence.

Authors:  Lesego Gabaitiri; Henry G Mwambi; Stephen W Lagakos; Marcello Pagano
Journal:  S Afr Stat J       Date:  2013-03

2.  Estimation of HIV incidence using multiple biomarkers.

Authors:  Ron Brookmeyer; Jacob Konikoff; Oliver Laeyendecker; Susan H Eshleman
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 4.897

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.