Literature DB >> 21668894

Demographic consequences of increased winter births in a large aseasonally breeding mammal (Bos taurus) in response to climate change.

Sarah Burthe1, Adam Butler, Kate R Searle, Stephen J G Hall, Stephen J Thackeray, Sarah Wanless.   

Abstract

1. Studies examining changes in the scheduling of breeding in response to climate change have focused on species with well-defined breeding seasons. Species exhibiting year-round breeding have received little attention and the magnitudes of any responses are unknown. 2. We investigated phenological data for an enclosed feral population of cattle (Bos taurus L.) in northern England exhibiting year-round breeding. This population is relatively free of human interference. 3. We assessed whether the timing of births had changed over the last 60 years, in response to increasing winter and spring temperatures, changes in herd density, and a regime of lime fertilisation. 4. Median birth date became earlier by 1·0 days per year. Analyses of the seasonal distribution of calving dates showed that significantly fewer calves were born in summer (decline from 44% of total births to 20%) and significantly more in winter (increase from 12% to 30%) over the study period. The most pronounced changes occurred in winter, with significant increases in both the proportion and number of births. Winter births arise from conceptions in the previous spring, and we considered models that investigated climate and weather variables associated with the winter preceding and the spring of conceptions. 5. The proportion of winter births was higher when the onset of the plant growing season was earlier during the spring of conceptions. This relationship was much weaker during years when the site had been fertilised with lime, suggesting that increased forage biomass was over-riding the impacts of changing plant phenology. When the onset of the growing season was late, winter births increased with female density. 6. Recruitment estimates from a stage-structured state-space population model were significantly negatively correlated with the proportion of births in the preceding winter, suggesting that calves born in winter are less likely to survive than those born in other seasons. 7. This is one of the first studies to document changes in the phenology of a year-round breeder, suggesting that the impact of climate on the scheduling of biological events may be more extensive than previously thought and that impacts may be negative, even for species with relatively flexible breeding strategies.
© 2011 The Authors. Journal of Animal Ecology © 2011 British Ecological Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21668894     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2011.01865.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Ecol        ISSN: 0021-8790            Impact factor:   5.091


  10 in total

1.  Social and ecological drivers of reproductive seasonality in geladas.

Authors:  Elizabeth Tinsley Johnson; Noah Snyder-Mackler; Amy Lu; Thore J Bergman; Jacinta C Beehner
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2018-02-17       Impact factor: 2.671

2.  Climate change and mammals: evolutionary versus plastic responses.

Authors:  Stan Boutin; Jeffrey E Lane
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 5.183

3.  Habitat selection by African buffalo (Syncerus caffer) in response to landscape-level fluctuations in water availability on two temporal scales.

Authors:  Emily Bennitt; Mpaphi Casper Bonyongo; Stephen Harris
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Responses of large mammals to climate change.

Authors:  Robyn S Hetem; Andrea Fuller; Shane K Maloney; Duncan Mitchell
Journal:  Temperature (Austin)       Date:  2014-07-21

5.  Response of reindeer mating time to climatic variability.

Authors:  Amélie Paoli; Robert B Weladji; Øystein Holand; Jouko Kumpula
Journal:  BMC Ecol       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 2.964

6.  Reassessing the determinants of breeding synchrony in ungulates.

Authors:  Annie K English; Aliénor L M Chauvenet; Kamran Safi; Nathalie Pettorelli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Assessing insect responses to climate change: What are we testing for? Where should we be heading?

Authors:  Nigel R Andrew; Sarah J Hill; Matthew Binns; Md Habibullah Bahar; Emma V Ridley; Myung-Pyo Jung; Chris Fyfe; Michelle Yates; Mohammad Khusro
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  Behavioural responses to thermal conditions affect seasonal mass change in a heat-sensitive northern ungulate.

Authors:  Floris M van Beest; Jos M Milner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Genetic diversity and phylogenetic analysis of native mountain ponies of Britain and Ireland reveals a novel rare population.

Authors:  Clare L Winton; Matthew J Hegarty; Robert McMahon; Gancho T Slavov; Neil R McEwan; Mina Cg Davies-Morel; Charly M Morgan; Wayne Powell; Deborah M Nash
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  Mismatch between birth date and vegetation phenology slows the demography of roe deer.

Authors:  Floriane Plard; Jean-Michel Gaillard; Tim Coulson; A J Mark Hewison; Daniel Delorme; Claude Warnant; Christophe Bonenfant
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 8.029

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.