Literature DB >> 21668861

Historical perspective on the use of visual grading scales in evaluating skin irritation and sensitization.

Miranda A Farage1, Howard I Maibach, Klaus E Andersen, Jean-Marie Lachapelle, Petra Kern, Cindy Ryan, Jeanne Ely, Amita Kanti.   

Abstract

Visual assessment of skin reactions has long been used to evaluate the safety of chemicals and preparations that contact the skin, and to meet regulatory requirements. This article reviews the history of visual grading scales, and the results of investigations into the reliability of the method. Some examples are provided to illustrate the diverse array of protocols that use visual scoring to evaluate skin irritation. Furthermore, as bioengineering methods are developed that can quantitate certain aspects of skin irritant and sensitization reactions, it is important to consider whether such measures should supplement or replace visual assessment. Examples of investigations comparing the outcomes of studies that use visual scoring and those that use bioengineering methods are discussed. These examples provide little evidence that bioengineering measures provide an improvement in overall quality in comparison with current testing methods that rely on visual assessment. In addition, such measuring techniques can add considerably to the complexity of testing protocols. When benefits and cost are weighed in the balance, the visual assessment scales popularized by Draize and others remain an effective, practical method of evaluation.
© 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21668861     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2011.01912.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contact Dermatitis        ISSN: 0105-1873            Impact factor:   6.600


  6 in total

1.  In Vitro and In Vivo Performance of a Pre-Filled, Electrochemically-Actuated Infusion System.

Authors:  Assaf Shaked; Ella Tenenbaum-Koren; Jacob Atsmon; Peter Noymer
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 4.200

2.  Mitigation of nitrogen mustard mediated skin injury by a novel indomethacin bifunctional prodrug.

Authors:  Gabriella M Composto; Jeffrey D Laskin; Debra L Laskin; Donald R Gerecke; Robert P Casillas; Ned D Heindel; Laurie B Joseph; Diane E Heck
Journal:  Exp Mol Pathol       Date:  2016-05-14       Impact factor: 3.362

3.  Skin Reaction Report Form: Development and Design of a Standardized Report Form for Skin Reactions Due to Medical Devices for Diabetes Management.

Authors:  Guido Freckmann; Sina Buck; Delia Waldenmaier; Eva Zschornack; Manuela Link; Nina Jendrike; Ines Obstfelder; Sara Vetrugno; Stefanie Kamann; Cornelia Haug
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2020-03-22

4.  Healthcare workers' hand microbiome may mediate carriage of hospital pathogens.

Authors:  Mariana Rosenthal; Allison Aiello; Elaine Larson; Carol Chenoweth; Betsy Foxman
Journal:  Pathogens       Date:  2013-12-27

5.  Delta-5® oil, containing the anti-inflammatory fatty acid sciadonic acid, improves skin barrier function in a skin irritation model in healthy female subjects.

Authors:  Alvin Berger
Journal:  Lipids Health Dis       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 4.315

6.  Ocular pharmacokinetics and tolerability of bimatoprost ophthalmic solutions administered once or twice daily in rabbits, and clinical dosing implications.

Authors:  Jie Shen; Margot L Goodkin; Warren Tong; Mayssa Attar
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-09-28
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.