BACKGROUND: Basophil histamine release (BHR) to allergen has been used as a confirmatory test to support the clinical diagnosis of allergic disease. OBJECTIVE: Among subjects reporting respiratory cat allergy, we hypothesized that cat-induced BHR in vitro would predict nasal allergen challenge (NAC) response in that same individual. We therefore compared the magnitude of cat allergen-induced BHR to NAC outcome and serological measures of cat-specific IgE and the ratio of cat-specific IgE to total IgE. METHODS: Forty-two subjects with a history of cat allergy, positive cat puncture skin test (PST) and detectable cat-specific IgE (> 0.1 kAU/L, ImmunoCap) participated with consent. Subjects were grouped as positive or negative cat allergen-induced BHR, with a positive result defined as the release of ≥ 20% of the total cellular histamine content. The majority of subjects also underwent a NAC with a positive result defined as ≥ 5 total sneezes. RESULTS: Subjects with a positive compared with a negative cat allergen BHR had higher cat-specific IgE levels at 5.40 ± 1.24 kAU/L (n=25) vs. 1.55 ± 0.73 kAU/L (n=17, P=0.01) as well as a higher cat-specific IgE/total IgE ratio [6.1 ± 1.4% (n=25) vs. 1.6 ± 0.9% (n=17, P=0.01)]. Of the 31 subjects who underwent a NAC, a positive NAC was observed in 78% (18/23) with a positive cat allergen BHR compared with 37% (3/8) with a negative cat allergen BHR, giving a positive predictive value of 78% and a negative predictive value of 63%. The diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of a positive BHR to predict a positive NAC was 86% and 50%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: A positive cat allergen-induced BHR is associated with higher cat-specific IgE levels, a higher cat-specific to total IgE ratio and is predictive of a positive cat-induced NAC [ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00604786].
BACKGROUND: Basophil histamine release (BHR) to allergen has been used as a confirmatory test to support the clinical diagnosis of allergic disease. OBJECTIVE: Among subjects reporting respiratory cat allergy, we hypothesized that cat-induced BHR in vitro would predict nasal allergen challenge (NAC) response in that same individual. We therefore compared the magnitude of cat allergen-induced BHR to NAC outcome and serological measures of cat-specific IgE and the ratio of cat-specific IgE to total IgE. METHODS: Forty-two subjects with a history of cat allergy, positive cat puncture skin test (PST) and detectable cat-specific IgE (> 0.1 kAU/L, ImmunoCap) participated with consent. Subjects were grouped as positive or negative cat allergen-induced BHR, with a positive result defined as the release of ≥ 20% of the total cellular histamine content. The majority of subjects also underwent a NAC with a positive result defined as ≥ 5 total sneezes. RESULTS: Subjects with a positive compared with a negative cat allergen BHR had higher cat-specific IgE levels at 5.40 ± 1.24 kAU/L (n=25) vs. 1.55 ± 0.73 kAU/L (n=17, P=0.01) as well as a higher cat-specific IgE/total IgE ratio [6.1 ± 1.4% (n=25) vs. 1.6 ± 0.9% (n=17, P=0.01)]. Of the 31 subjects who underwent a NAC, a positive NAC was observed in 78% (18/23) with a positive cat allergen BHR compared with 37% (3/8) with a negative cat allergen BHR, giving a positive predictive value of 78% and a negative predictive value of 63%. The diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of a positive BHR to predict a positive NAC was 86% and 50%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: A positive cat allergen-induced BHR is associated with higher cat-specific IgE levels, a higher cat-specific to total IgE ratio and is predictive of a positive cat-induced NAC [ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00604786].
Authors: Emily C McGowan; Jessica H Savage; Jean-Paul Courneya; Patricia M Sterba; Saitu Parihar; Jing Lin; Gustavo Gimenez; Hugh A Sampson; John Schroeder; Donald MacGlashan; Robert A Wood; Robert G Hamilton; Sarbjit Saini Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2014-06-27 Impact factor: 10.793
Authors: J M Orengo; A R Radin; V Kamat; A Badithe; L H Ben; B L Bennett; S Zhong; D Birchard; A Limnander; A Rafique; J Bautista; A Kostic; D Newell; X Duan; M C Franklin; W Olson; T Huang; N A Gandhi; L Lipsich; N Stahl; N J Papadopoulos; A J Murphy; G D Yancopoulos Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2018-04-12 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: G W Scadding; A Eifan; M Penagos; A Dumitru; A Switzer; O McMahon; D Phippard; A Togias; S R Durham; M H Shamji Journal: Clin Exp Allergy Date: 2015-03 Impact factor: 5.018